True, but the notion that Unhealthy teams lose,
sometimes gets minimized. Maybe. Yes? No?
I think there are some…and I encounter them…who do not accept the idea that if your OL isn’t at least RELATIVELY healthy, you can’t play.
There are some near exceptions, but circumstances always explain them.
But I think we all agree that if Foles can play, that he is the qb we hope, then we DON’T want him playing behind an extensively injured OL without a valid running threat.
Yet…precisely that has happened in the last 3 years.
The “no running threat” thing was just 4 games.
But the OL was an extensively injured mess (not relatively healthy, as in with just 1 or 2 replacements, but extensively injured) for a lot of long stretches there. The first 8 games of 2012, the last game of 2013, and pretty much, in different ways at different times, all of 2014.
What;’s the record in games where they have a relatively healthy OL AND a running threat, regardless of the qb? Unlike my previous calculus, which counted the qb, that’s 19 games. In those games their record is 10-8-1 (55%) even though in 8 of them Clemens is the qb. In the other 29 games, their record is 10-19 (34%), regardless of the qb.
.