Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Miklasz: Wilson contract may shake NFC West
- This topic has 8 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 9 months ago by zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 31, 2015 at 6:39 am #17717znModerator
Bernie: Wilson contract may shake NFC WestBy Bernie Miklasz
PHOENIX • With only the New England Patriots left to stop them, the Seattle Seahawks are in pursuit of their second consecutive Super Bowl championship.
But even if the Seahawks prevail Sunday in Super Bowl 49, there may be hope for NFC West division rivals Arizona, San Francisco and St. Louis.
That’s because Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson is about to get paid.
And Wilson’s huge deal will could become a pretty big deal in shifting the power in the rugged NFC West.
Over the past three seasons, you can make the case that no NFL player has been more valuable to his team than Wilson if you also factor in his compensation.
In terms of performance, Wilson been the ideal quarterback for Seattle. But it goes beyond that. Wilson’s value is greatly enhanced by his relatively modest salary. And that’s given Seattle a competitive advantage.
Because he was drafted in the third round in 2012, Wilson’s entry-level deal was worth “only” $3 million over four years.
Wilson is making $817,000 this season, which ranked 53rd among NFL quarterbacks in pay for 2014.
That’s right … 52 quarterbacks made more money than Wilson this season. Heck, Wilson didn’t even make as much as his backup, Tavaris Jackson ($1.25 million.)
All told, Seattle invested a mere $2.6 million in their three quarterback salaries this season, which amounts to only 2 percent of their payroll.
Contrast that to the Rams, who dished out a combined $19.93 million to Sam Bradford ($17.61 million), Shaun Hill ($1.75 mil) and Austin Davis ($570,000.)
Wilson’s rookie contract runs through next season, but he can renegotiate after this season. Seattle is hopeful of getting down to business soon, and Wilson could command an average salary as high as $20 million per season.
That would force Seattle to make some tough decisions on impending free agents such as CB Byron Maxwell, LB Malcolm Smith, and DT Kevin Williams. Or others, like TE Zach Miller, could become salary-cap cuts.
The Seahawks are also looking to take care of Bobby Wagner, their special MLB. And even though RB Marshawn Lynch is under contract through 2015, he’ll likely be pressuring management for a new deal after the season.
The Seahawks gave safety Earl Thomas a substantial new contract after last season. To account for that and Wilson’s looming payday, the defending Super Bowl champs cut ties with several key veterans last offseason. DE Red Bryant and pass rusher Chris Clemons were cap casualties, and CB Brandon Browner, WR Golden Tate and DL Clinton McDonald were among those who walked via free agency. The Seahawks also traded overpaid WR Percy Harvin to the NY Jets in an obvious salary dump.
Squeezed by the salary cap, the Seahawks had a relatively quiet offseason last year. And their free-agent shopping will be limited again this coming offseason.
Seattle GM John Schneider has been busy trying to put together a plan that can accommodate the Seahawks’ core players financially without doing heavy damage to the overall roster.
But with the coming contract for Wilson, the Seahawks arguably face their biggest challenge since coach Pete Carroll and Schneider were hired before the 2010 season.
This is nothing new. After winning the Super Bowl, the 2012 Baltimore Ravens rewarded QB Joe Flacco with an enormous contract. That forced team management into making difficult roster decisions to keep the cap under control. The Ravens parted ways with several big-name veterans including safety Ed Reed and WR Anquan Boldin.
As they say … there is a price for success.
“John has has spent a tremendous amount of effort looking down the road to see how we can continue to maintain the core of our club at the high level and with the guys that we have built it around,” Carroll said Thursday. “We’re in the process of doing that and I think it should be pretty obvious that we reward our own guys and those are the guys not only that we’ve sighted early that we thought were going to be good but we’ve been able to develop and really kind of guarantee where we’re going with them.
“That’s a big part of this. There is a fine balance in there and we saw the Ravens a couple years ago, they had to have a big change in their football team because of the financial aspect of that. We don’t anticipate that. We think we’re structured in a way that we can hold on – that’s being optimistic and looking for the good stuff here, that’s how we’re seeing it.
“It brings us to very difficult decisions come the offseason. We’ll always have those and every team does. We’re hoping that being able to see and trust in what we’ve seen from our players now and we’ll be able to maintain that nucleus of the club that will allow us to keep the identity and keep the focus.”
Though Carroll didn’t come out and directly say it, he implied that Wilson can make a difference; it depends on what the quarterback wants in a new contract. If Wilson signs for less than anticipated, perhaps the Seahawks will have a better chance of keeping the band together.
“I know Russell wants to play on a really good team too,” Carroll said.
Earlier this week, Schneider discussed Wilson’s future and how the contract could impact the team’s approach to roster building. It appears that the Seahawks will be getting younger.
“It presents challenges, there is no question,’’ Schneider said. “We haven’t sat down with his representatives. We are still going to be drafting young players and playing young players, so we might not be able to dip into free agency like you may want to here and there or compensate somebody else that you want to compensate that is already on your team, but just the fact that we’re going to continue to keep drafted players and playing young players should help us compensate for whatever level of compensation (for Wilson) is.”
Seattle’s three NFC West rivals have their own issues and problems to confront. It won’t be easy to overtake the Seahawks. But the Wilson contract could make it easier for the Cardinals, 49ers and Rams to close the gap.
January 31, 2015 at 6:43 am #17718znModeratorYou know I did a quick look at this a couple weeks back.
I went to Over.the.cap.com and looked at the Seattle cap situation, and who their FAs will be, and so on. I took it from 2015 through 2017.
And, I don’t agree that extending Wilson and giving him his 20 or so M will hurt them.
It looks to me like they managed things quite well. They can sign Wilson and keep the defense intact through 2017 at least, near as I could tell.
Plus they have 3 drafts from now through 2017 too.
I ain’t no paid professional cap-xpert or nothin, but I didn’t see where they would get hurt.
January 31, 2015 at 11:21 am #17735InvaderRamModeratorYou know I did a quick look at this a couple weeks back.
I went to Over.the.cap.com and looked at the Seattle cap situation, and who their FAs will be, and so on. I took it from 2015 through 2017.
And, I don’t agree that extending Wilson and giving him his 20 or so M will hurt them.
It looks to me like they managed things quite well. They can sign Wilson and keep the defense intact through 2017 at least, near as I could tell.
Plus they have 3 drafts from now through 2017 too.
I ain’t no paid professional cap-xpert or nothin, but I didn’t see where they would get hurt.
…
look harder.
January 31, 2015 at 11:29 am #17736znModerator;
You know I did a quick look at this a couple weeks back.I went to Over.the.cap.com and looked at the Seattle cap situation, and who their FAs will be, and so on. I took it from 2015 through 2017.
And, I don’t agree that extending Wilson and giving him his 20 or so M will hurt them.
It looks to me like they managed things quite well. They can sign Wilson and keep the defense intact through 2017 at least, near as I could tell.
Plus they have 3 drafts from now through 2017 too.
I ain’t no paid professional cap-xpert or nothin, but I didn’t see where they would get hurt.
…
look harder.
Really, they have this managed.
The Wilson Contract Penalty? It aint there. The numbers are good for them.
February 4, 2015 at 10:00 pm #17931znModeratorAgent’s Take: What Russell Wilson’s blockbuster deal will look like
By Joel Corry | Former Sports AgentThe Seattle Seahawks are prepared to make Russell Wilson the NFL’s highest paid player during the offseason, according to NFL Media’s Ian Rapoport, even if he isn’t the same caliber quarterback as Tom Brady, a healthy Peyton Manning or Aaron Rodgers.
Wilson was the NFL’s biggest bargain in 2014 with a salary of $662,434. After the Super Bowl, Wilson will enter the final year of a four-year, $2,996,774 rookie contract he received in 2012 as a third-round pick.
Joe Flacco forced the Baltimore Ravens to briefly make him the NFL’s highest paid player with a six-year, $120.6 million contract, including $51 million in guarantees, after capping off a stellar postseason in a contract year by being named Super Bowl XLVII MVP. Nobody was considering Flacco as an elite quarterback. Eli Manning was arguably a top 10 quarterback when the New York Giants made him the highest player in 2009 with a six-year, $97.5 million contract extension.
Wilson has just as many Super Bowl victories with better statistics and more accolades than Flacco and Manning had when they got their big deals. Wilson is the game’s best dual quarterback. Although Wilson doesn’t have the same type of offensive responsibility as elite quarterbacks and has the luxury of playing with NFL’s best defense, he is the first starting quarterback to ever make it to two Super Bowls in his first three NFL seasons.
Wilson’s most lucrative contract will likely come from letting Andrew Luck set a new NFL salary standard. According to ESPN’s Adam Schefter, a contract extension making Luck the NFL’s highest paid player is on the horizon. Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay and Luck have separately downplayed the notion of an extension since Schefter first broke the story. If the report is true, Luck could become the NFL’s first $25 million per year player with his new deal.
…
Seattle’s contract preferences and conventions
Seahawks contracts typically are structured where the guaranteed money consists of base salary guarantees and a signing bonus. Base salary guarantees after the first contract year are for injury only initially at signing in most instances but become fully guaranteed usually five days after the start of the waiver period in each specific year. The waiver period begins the day after the Super Bowl so the guarantee date this year is Feb. 7.
The second contract year was fully guaranteed at signing in some deals before 2013. Marshawn Lynch’s $7 million 2013 base salary was fully guaranteed when he signed his deal in 2012. Per game roster bonuses are starting to become more prevalent in Seattle’s contracts. Michael Bennett has $1 million and $1.5 million of per game roster bonuses in the 2016 and 2017 of the four year contract he signed in the offseason.
One dynamic that could have an impact on the structure of Wilson’s contract is his decision to fire Bus Cook as his agent, who negotiated Jay Cutler’s player friendly deal. Wilson has hired his baseball agent, Mark Rodgers, who doesn’t have any other NFL clients. The football agent community gets nervous anytime someone perceived as inexperienced is negotiating a lucrative contract, especially with a quarterback, because the likelihood of the player signing a team-friendly deal that could impact future negotiations in the marketplace seems greater.
The concern may be unwarranted with Rodgers. He negotiated an eight-year, $121 million deal for Mike Hampton in 2000 with the Colorado Rockies, which was the richest contract in baseball history at the time. Rodgers being used to fully guaranteed contracts with baseball could work to Wilson’s advantage instead. It could be necessary for the Seahawks to make structural concessions with Wilson, like the Green Bay Packers have with Aaron Rodgers. He is the only player on the Packers with a veteran deal that has guarantees after the first contract year.
Thomas and Sherman’s contracts should be the team’s most relevant deals to Wilson’s negotiations. Those are Seattle’s only contracts that set the marketplace at a position. Thomas’ $10 million average per year is 14.29 percent greater than the $8.75 million average of Jairus Byrd’s deal with the New Orleans Saints. Byrd preceded Thomas as the NFL’s highest paid safety.
Sherman’s contract, which averages $14 million per year, is 16.67 percent higher than the one year, $12 million deal Darrelle Revis signed last March with the New England Patriots to become the NFL’s highest paid cornerback. Technically, Revis signed a two-year, $32 million contract but it was designed to be a one year deal. Thomas and Sherman’s deals combined are 15.66 percent greater than the previous salary benchmarks at their respective positions. When this percentage difference is applied to Rodgers’ deal, it yields approximately a $25.5 million average per year for Wilson.
Thomas received $25.725 million in guarantees. His signing bonus was $ 9.5million so 36.93 percent of his guarantees are in that form. Thomas’ signing bonus was layered on top of the 2014 salary he was scheduled to make prior to his new deal.
Precisely $11 million of Sherman’s $40 million in guarantees was a signing bonus. Just over 27 percent of his guarantees are signing bonus. Sherman’s 2014 base salary remained the same as it was before the extension.
The percentage of Wilson’s guarantees as signing bonus should fall somewhere between Thomas and Sherman’s based on how these deals are structured.
Result
Objectively, the data suggests that a contract averaging in the $24 million per year neighborhood with $65 million in guarantees and slightly over $73 million in the first three new years is appropriate for Wilson. Seattle has preferred four-year deals or extensions in recent years. Cliff Avril, Bennett, Kam Chancellor, Lynch, Sherman, Thomas, Max Unger and K.J. Wright signed for this length of time. A five- or six-year extension may be in order for Wilson to mirror the length of most lucrative quarterback deals.
Thomas and Sherman’s structure suggests that Wilson should receive a $20 million to $25 million signing bonus. Wilson earned the fourth year “proven performance” escalator for third- through seventh-round picks under the 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement’s rookie wage scale. His 2015 salary increases to the lowest restricted free agent tender since he hit the 35 percent offensive playtime mark in two of his first three seasons. If the 2015 salary cap is $142 million, the lowest restricted free agent tender will be $1.528 million. Wilson’s 2015 base salary will likely equal whatever the final number is because that would be consistent with their deals.
The effect on Seattle’s salary cap
Schneider acknowledged Jan. 27 at Super Bowl media day that a new Wilson pact would present roster challenges the team hasn’t faced before with Wilson under his rookie contract. Wilson’s 2015 cap number shouldn’t be more than $6.75 million with the new deal. The bigger impact will begin taking place in 2016 when Wilson starts having large cap numbers.
The deal won’t prevent the Seahawks from keeping Lynch in 2015 at his $8.5 million cap number. That’s because no more than $5 million of the team’s projected $18.618 million in cap space once the top 51 players are accounted for by including tenders for restricted free agents and exclusive rights players with expiring contracts should be used with Wilson. There should still be enough cap room to extend linebacker Bobby Wagner’s contract while retaining Lynch. Wagner’s deal shouldn’t take up more than $2.5 million of Seattle’s existing 2015 cap room based on how the team structures contracts.
Defensive tackle Brandon Mebane and tight end Zach Miller, who are on injured reserve, could be cap casualties. The Seahawks would gain $5.5 million cap space by releasing Mebane. $2,890,625 of cap room would be freed up by parting ways with Miller.
It may become more challenging to re-sign left tackle Russell Okung with Wilson’s new deal. 2015 is also his contract year. Although he hasn’t consistently played at a high level since his 2012 Pro Bowl season, he probably won’t be interested in a new contract that’s less the six-year, $48.5 million deal (with $29.3 million guaranteed and worth a maximum of $58 million) he signed in 2010 as an unproven commodity when he was the sixth overall pick in the Draft.
February 4, 2015 at 10:14 pm #17932wvParticipantI don’t really understand how you can think there’s no contract penalty
when he’s been playing for less than a million and now he’ll be playing
for fifteen million. I mean, thats a fourteen million dollar
penalty they way i look at it. Thats fourteen million dollars
they would have been able to spend on other players and now they cant.
Maybe this is just semantics, i dunno.w
vFebruary 4, 2015 at 10:53 pm #17937znModeratorI don’t really understand how you can think there’s no contract penalty
when he’s been playing for less than a million and now he’ll be playing
for fifteen million. I mean, thats a fourteen million dollar
penalty they way i look at it. Thats fourteen million dollars
they would have been able to spend on other players and now they cant.
Maybe this is just semantics, i dunno.w
vBecause they have the cap space in 2015 and 2016 to handle it, and only a couple of major guys (Okung, Mebane) coming up in 2016 but that’s it.
It may be more money than before for Wilson, but they planned around it.
The point is they’re not going to lose anyone.
Yes it’s also true they can’t add anyone in terms of FAs, but…go through their roster and name their FAs.
The next 2 years also means trades and/or draft picks, and they’re good at both, and both are cheap.
February 4, 2015 at 11:09 pm #17941wvParticipantI don’t really understand how you can think there’s no contract penalty
when he’s been playing for less than a million and now he’ll be playing
for fifteen million. I mean, thats a fourteen million dollar
penalty they way i look at it. Thats fourteen million dollars
they would have been able to spend on other players and now they cant.
Maybe this is just semantics, i dunno.w
vBecause they have the cap space in 2015 and 2016 to handle it, and only a couple of major guys (Okung, Mebane) coming up in 2016 but that’s it.
It may be more money than before for Wilson, but they planned around it.
The point is they’re not going to lose anyone.
Yes it’s also true they can’t add anyone in terms of FAs, but…go through their roster and name their FAs.
The next 2 years also means trades and/or draft picks, and they’re good at both, and both are cheap.
Ok, I agree they planned for RW’s big raise, and they
have been brilliant with their personnel choices and personnel management.But Wilson has been playing for peanuts and there aint
no more huge QB-discount. 15 million means they cant
add two New excellent players.Should be very interesting to see what kind of team
the Seahawks put on the field next year. Does
a gutwrenching Super Bowl loss really affect
a team the next season? I dunno.w
vFebruary 4, 2015 at 11:14 pm #17943 -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.