Which game is more important to you to win? Giants or Seahawks?

Well, i cant see them beating
Seattle in Seattle, with a backup QB.
Just cant see it.
So unless they knock out Russell Wilson
or unless the game means nothing to Seattle
that’ll be a big fat “L”

Year 4 though — I’ll be surprised
if they dont get ten wins.

w
v

zn wrote:

Which game is more important to you to win? Giants or Seahawks?

That’s a hard question to answer; I am not even sure it’s a fair question.

I want them to win both.

A loss to the Giants would mean bad things. So you want a win there.

A win in Seattle would mean great things. So you want a win there.

Yeah I agree. Impossible for me to decide which loss would be more palatable. Trying to makes my head hurt. I feel like my memory banks are overloading like those alien computers on Star Trek that Kirk tricks into destroying themselves by presenting them with a paradox they can’t solve.
The correct answer is they have to win *every* game. Obviously that won’t happen but for me choosing between them is like trying to decide which of your children you would rather sell into slavery.

A loss isn’t a loss isn’t a loss.

If we lost to the Giants because Odell Beckham simply had the greatest game a receiver ever had, it’d be hard to get upset about that, especially if the DBs were playing well and he was just All-World.

If we lost to the Seahawks because we couldn’t stop the run, but actually had offensive production and were in the game… I’d be pretty upset about that.

I don’t think we have to choose which victory. If we had to choose, I’d choose beating the Seahawks every day because it’s a division game on the road. But HOW we won would be important. If it were only on a few trick plays and ST plays, but otherwise both Ds just shut the game down, then I dunno. I’d take it and be happy, but it wouldn’t be like BEATING them in their house.

Certainly not like we’ve been BEAT in our house…