What do we think/feel ? Anything?

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House What do we think/feel ? Anything?

Viewing 19 posts - 1 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #116172
    wv
    Participant

    It is so infuriating/disheartening to see more and more and more incidences of bullying and abuse by the Police. They have to know they are on camera. And so many of them…just…dont…care. Or they feel like ‘they’ are being disrespected, or they are being challenged, or they are being victimized.
    That attitude HAS to be a reflection of the leadership in their departments.

    Its bad enough to be a Leftist in America today. To see through the political bullshit, to recognize the systemic corruption and destructiveness of Capitalism. To see the mass extinctions, pollution, imperialism, torture, drone-murders, CIA-lies, etc etc etc.

    Thats all bad enough. I had no words for THAT. But now, to see such a significant segment of American Police Departments acting like violent infantile/fascists….well. I have seen reflections of this ‘infantile’ streak in many cops over the years. Its a ‘thing.’ But i haven’t seen it turn to violence very often.

    The bar is so absurdly low now, in this country.
    We are now fighting for…um…what? The right to peacefully protest when the government murders someone on camera?

    I just dont have words. I cant untangle my thoughts/feelings.

    Maybe some months from now, i dunno.

    w
    v
    In what language does rain fall over tormented cities?”
    — Pablo Neruda (Book of Questions)
    ————-
    “Emotions, in my experience, aren’t covered by single words.
    I don’t believe in “sadness”, “joy”, or “regret”.
    Maybe the best proof that the language is patriarchal is that is oversimplifies feeling. I’d like to have at my disposal complicated hybrid emotions.”
    — Jeffrey Eugenides (Middlesex

    #116178
    InvaderRam
    Moderator

    yeah. i don’t know what to think honestly. my mind is just overwhelmed. but after 2016, i guess it was just a matter of when something like this was going to blow up.

    not that problems weren’t brewing before that.

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by InvaderRam.
    #116180
    Zooey
    Moderator

    Not only are they doing it on film, a lot of people in this country seem perfectly okay with it, even delight in it.

    I think it’s questionable what would happen if Trump just declared martial law. Was it here, or on FB where I saw the special letter he sent out selling camo MAGA hats “exclusively” for members of the Trump army to wear to identify themselves? He is going “there.”

    I did see somebody (Joint Chief of Staffs?) say the other day that the military would not obey unlawful orders. So that may be a good thing.

    #116191
    zn
    Moderator

    My 2 cents.

    To be honest, the police violence does not surprise me. I mean it’s shocking and disturbing but it’s not a surprise. That’s not everywhere of course–as of right now more than 700 towns and cities have had protests and the vast majority are both peaceful in themselves and unmolested by police. But some of the imagery is so dark (and I’ve posted a lot of it here). Way over the top–like police deliberately shooting people in the face with tear gas canisters at short range.

    What is my attitude about the whole thing, all combined?

    I am heartened by the size, scope, and extent of the protests. 4 years ago I never thought protests led by a group called BlackLivesMatter would be this powerful, widespread, and deep. I am heartened by all the international protests. I am heartened by images of cities full of protesters to the tune of 10s of thousands of them.

    I am also heartened by the way the message is being supported. A poll I posted says that 74% of the country believes the Floyd murder points to underlying systemic racism in the system. 74%?! I never expected that.

    These images will remain in political consciousness for a long time. I’ve never seen anything like it. And I was at some anti-war protests when I was in high school. Now what the real changes will be…we’ll see.

    View this post on Instagram

    LA showed up today!!! #blacklivesmatter

    A post shared by Ron Kurokawa (@yakooza) on

    #116195
    Mackeyser
    Moderator

    Yeah.

    It is very easy to succumb to despair in these times, but two things prevent me from doing so.

    1) This shit is all by design. I really do think that this excessive and very public violence is meant to overwhelm people and have them retreat due to mental, physical, emotional and spiritual exhaustion. I really do think the powers that be are sick and tired of pretending that they aren’t in charge, are tired of having to answer to a process and much like public education see what we have as too much freedom, too much democracy, too much information which is why we see such powerful and sustained attacks on everything which informs viable self-determination. And fuck that if I’m gonna give in to these assholes.

    2) So many people especially Zoomers are jumping into this fight with both feet and I’ll be damned if I’m gonna not do everything I can to support them. All they may need from me is my mass as they hope to create gravity for their movement. Well, I can do that. I can elevate their cause and I can be the change that they seek. I can’t lead and I’ll be damned if I get out of the way, so follow it is.

    I honestly have said for some time now that if we held an election about whether to remain a democracy or not and EVERYONE had to vote up or down, that much like Brexit, the down with democracy would pass. I ESPECIALLY felt that way when Obama was President and all the centrists and shitlibs not only fell asleep, but were pissed about anyone trying to wake them up to the atrocities going on.

    This is why I don’t trust the centrists and liberals with anything on principle. They are more concerned with being able to go back to sleep than to fix the structural problems. It’s like the roof is leaking and they only give a shit when the water is falling on them. They don’t care when someone else is getting wet, nor do they care about the damage to the house. And that bullshit is frustrating as hell, but we might as well use them while we can.

    Anyway, I really feel strongly that I cannot give in to despair as long as there’s someone fighting.

    In my MMOs that I play, a party would be in a Raid (20-40 people) or a dungeon (4-5 people) and against a boss, there would be times when everyone, but one person was dead. Sometimes, instead of giving into despair, that person would continue to fight…and win…alone against a big boss. I’ve had those moments where it seemed that we’d all die and have to start over, but I kept fighting, going through my rotation, keeping my guard up and avoiding damage and winning the battle.

    These mostly young-uns are fighting the big fight… honestly, as close to a civil war as we may come especially with Trump in the White House and they’re winning. This the same generation that due to being separated from having anything, are free from undue loyalties, free from unlearned prejudices, free from uninstilled dogma. They’ve brought Trillion dollar corporations to heel and are changing politics as we speak. A single tweet that goes viral can seriously damage a company’s bottom line for an entire year or more, end a politicians career or start a movement.

    There are days where I just can’t… but I realize it’s not up to me. Boomers and GenX fucked it up in so many ways and this Gen is fighting the fight that we should have fought. I mean, the fact that this country wasn’t shut down by either the Rodney King beating (let alone that trial) or Sandy Hook demonstrates our failure.

    Sports is the crucible of human virtue. The distillate remains are human vice.

    #116199
    wv
    Participant

    Seems to me, Adolph Reed is just pointing to the idea that there’s two layers of ‘reform’ we can ‘see’ (not see, if we have ideological blinders).

    One layer has to do with all the changes in actual police polices, regulations, and discipline reforms that liberals want to see.

    The deeper layer though, has to do with Class. Ie, this is more than an ‘police’ problem its a Capitalism Problem. The police are just the tool, Capitalism uses to protect wealthy-privilege, etc. I think Reed is just saying, if we just focus on race, we are always going to be dealing with layer1 and not layer2.
    Layer1 is very important, though. Layer2 — the invisible layer — is unlikely to be dealt with.

    w
    v

    #116203
    Billy_T
    Participant

    If we’re just talking about the US and our relatively brief history, police violence has always been with us, of course. But I don’t think we’ve seen such a widespread attempt, from the top down, to promote a culture of cruelty, prior to Trump. At least not since Andrew Jackson. And, to make this worse, a culture of avoiding responsibility for that cruelty.

    Impunity. A culture of cruelty with impunity.

    He ran on that. He ran on cruelty to immigrants, black and brown people in general, dissenters, critics, reporters, especially female reporters . . . to anyone who dared say something critical about him. He ran as someone the supposedly “forgotten (white) man” could cheer on for that cruelty . . . so they could live vicariously through Trump. So they could cheer on someone who gets away with doing stuff they typically can’t do, or at least do so easily.

    And once he got into power, he continued to avoid responsibility for his horrific actions. He got away with putting kids in cages, destroying environmental regs, destroying the civil rights division of the DoJ, gutting workplace regs, and stacking the courts with far-right judges. He got away with colluding with Russia and strong-arming Ukraine. He got away with endlessly attacking, bashing, insulting all of his critics, threatening them with goddess knows what — doing goddess knows what. It may just be now, after he sent out unidentified, heavily militarized jack-boots to clear peaceful protests — for a photo op at a church!! that he may finally pay for his crimes. But who knows?

    To make a long story short . . . yeah, this police violence, the violence of the capitalist system it protects . . . . these things have been with us for centuries. But we’ve never had a president/admin (until now) that seemed to relish its cruelty, expand and amplify it so proudly, or scream out the message of who counts as “American” and who doesn’t. Trump has made it abundantly clear to the powerful and their lackeys that they have carte blanche to go after those who don’t count in Trumpland.

    #116204
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Seems to me, Adolph Reed is just pointing to the idea that there’s two layers of ‘reform’ we can ‘see’ (not see, if we have ideological blinders).

    One layer has to do with all the changes in actual police polices, regulations, and discipline reforms that liberals want to see.

    The deeper layer though, has to do with Class. Ie, this is more than an ‘police’ problem its a Capitalism Problem. The police are just the tool, Capitalism uses to protect wealthy-privilege, etc. I think Reed is just saying, if we just focus on race, we are always going to be dealing with layer1 and not layer2.
    Layer1 is very important, though. Layer2 — the invisible layer — is unlikely to be dealt with.

    w
    v

    Agreed, WV.

    Capitalism reproduces, acerbates, increases, expands class conflict and division. It has to, or it can’t function. You can’t accumulate “capital” without creating massive inequality and class conflicts, unless it’s owned and shared by all, in which case it’s no longer “capitalism.”

    Racial, sexual, gendered, religious minorities are hit with an even higher level of these malign effects, but they won’t escape them if we somehow magically end discrimination on “social” grounds. As long as it exists along economic grounds, we will always have an unjust society/world, etc. And as long as we bar democracy from the economic realm, we can’t have it in the political realm, which means we won’t ever end that discrimination.

    The absence of democracy from the economy guarantees its absence, in real terms, from the political. To me, this movement has to include “class,” or it won’t have longterm success.

    #116205
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Forgot to mention this atrocity:

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/detained-migrants-say-they-were-forced-clean-covid-infected-ice-n1228831

    Migrant detainees forced to clean up Covid-infected ICE buildings in Arizona. Why isn’t this the subject of Congressional hearings/Inspector General reports, etc.?

    The perfect, obscene storm of racism, the culture of cruelty and privatization.

    #116213
    zn
    Moderator

    Seems to me, Adolph Reed is just pointing to the idea that there’s two layers of ‘reform’ we can ‘see’ (not see, if we have ideological blinders).

    One layer has to do with all the changes in actual police polices, regulations, and discipline reforms that liberals want to see.

    The deeper layer though, has to do with Class.

    To be honest I am surprised that my friends in this thread don’t see the good news part, which is that we have had sustained, huge, widespread protests against police brutality for the first time…well since I can even remember. That means, among other things, that a majority believe the Floyd killing points to systemic racism. 4 years ago the majority did NOT believe things like that.

    This is a huge part of what’s happening. Chomsky for example on the protests: “The popular reaction to the gruesome Floyd murder has been astonishing in its national scope, fervent commitment and interracial solidarity,” observed the philosopher and social critic Noam Chomsky. I posted the source here: http://theramshuddle.com/topic/after-15-stunning-days-of-anti-racist-protests-what-happens-next/

    Why am I the only one in the thread noting this aspect of it?

    Now the problem is, while you can have a real alliance against issues revolving around race,it’s not the same for issues of class. Chomksky once said that Vietnam got heavily protested because the elite themselves were divided. It’s the exact same thing now, with the issue of systemic racism as exposed by the Floyd murder. We will NOT get the same broad alliance on issues of class. For obvious reasons.

    And along with that, it also remains to be seen what actual changes will come about. (In the article I cited, Chomsky makes that point too.) That’s a big one. But still, for right now before we know where it leads, never in our lifetimes have a majority of the population agreed that an incident like the Floyd murder pointed to pervasive, deep systemic racism, and never before has there been a sustained protest like this against something like that.

    And the fact that in many cases the police over-reacted (visibly, on camera) just helped the cause.

    #116216
    Billy_T
    Participant

    ZN,

    Definitely a great thing to see the sustained protests and the large majority of Americans who support them. That is amazing and wonderful. Heart-warming, to be sure.

    I think some of the reactions to Trump’s continued calls for military invasions of American cities are hopeful as well, but the calls themselves are obviously ominous. They don’t bode well for November, IMO. The reactions do. Trump’s tweets and conspiracy theories don’t, nor does the continued escalation of rhetoric regarding “antifa” from right-wing media.

    So, basically, it’s a mix. Great news, horrific news. We perhaps should focus more on the former . . .

    (Using your suggestions from the linking post, will add try two articles of possible interest by themselves below)

    #116218
    Billy_T
    Participant

    No luck on posting the links, ZN.

    One from the WaPo and one from Salon.

    #116217
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Trump’s rage at another governor makes him look weak and pathetic
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/06/11/trumps-rage-another-governor-makes-him-look-weak-pathetic/

    “Go back to your bunker”: Mayor rejects Trump threat to invade Seattle over peaceful “cop-free” zone
    https://www.salon.com/2020/06/11/go-back-to-your-bunker-mayor-rejects-trump-threat-to-invade-seattle-over-peaceful-cop-free-zone/

    #116220
    zn
    Moderator

    No luck on posting the links, ZN.

    One from the WaPo and one from Salon.

    Got em. But everyone, please read this thread: BT & others–simple things on the “spam” issue–mods please read http://theramshuddle.com/topic/bt-others-simple-things-on-the-spam-issue-mods-please-read/

    I NEED EVERYONE’S HELP WITH THIS SO PLEASE TAKE THE MERE COUPLE OF MINUTES NEEDED TO GIVE THAT LINKED POST A READ. Read this post too cause it explains why I need things done the way that post describes.

    See, if you just say something in a thread, then me seeing it depends on me happening to read that thread right away, while also posting other stuff on both forums, and also while actually doing real world work.
    That’s why I am asking people to alert me about spam-catcher issues in the chat pm–something I explain in the thread I just linked. The chat pm ALERTS me that I have a message.

    So as it stands, me catching spam-pending posts depends on (1) when I check the dashboard for pending posts (and that’s not every 20 minutes though I would like it to be) and (2) someone saying something in a thread, but me catching that quickly means reading every new post immediately 24/7.

    If you use the chat pm the advantage is, it alerts me. I get an alert and can then not simply depend on chance timing to find out a post is hung up.

    Fair enough?

    #116224
    Billy_T
    Participant

    ZN,

    Thanks for reposting those links. Will try to remember the chat option.

    I know you mentioned there were obvious reasons for the inability to form effective coalitions on the basis of “class.” But I think the topic is still worth hashing out, despite the potential for stating the obvious.

    It’s always struck me as baffling that when America and most of the West was far less unequal, economically — during the 1960s — it seemed easier to form those coalitions. Just three people today — Bezos, Gates and Zuckerburg — control more wealth than the bottom half of the nation combined . . . and CEOs routinely make hundreds to thousands of times their rank and file. That would have been unthinkable when MLK and RFK talked about economic justice for Americans, and the young, especially, demanded economic equality.

    It’s complicated, complex, etc. etc. . . . but I still think it’s important to discuss. Why then, but not now? Today’s 99% has never been further away from the 1%. Economic hierarchies have never been this steep. The system hasn’t been this plutocrat-friendly since the first Gilded Age, etc.

    Strange days, these.

    #116226
    zn
    Moderator

    ZN,

    Thanks for reposting those links. Will try to remember the chat option.

    I know you mentioned there were obvious reasons for the inability to form effective coalitions on the basis of “class.” But I think the topic is still worth hashing out, despite the potential for stating the obvious.

    It’s always struck me as baffling that when America and most of the West was far less unequal, economically — during the 1960s — it seemed easier to form those coalitions. Just three people today — Bezos, Gates and Zuckerburg — control more wealth than the bottom half of the nation combined . . . and CEOs routinely make hundreds to thousands of times their rank and file. That would have been unthinkable when MLK and RFK talked about economic justice for Americans, and the young, especially, demanded economic equality.

    It’s complicated, complex, etc. etc. . . . but I still think it’s important to discuss. Why then, but not now? Today’s 99% has never been further away from the 1%. Economic hierarchies have never been this steep. The system hasn’t been this plutocrat-friendly since the first Gilded Age, etc.

    Strange days, these.

    Just improvising here, without much depth to it. But I think in different ways people are blind to both class and race.

    The difference is, that racial issues can potentially touch on people’s almost innate dedication to ideas of human rights and equality before the law. It resonates. You have to crack through a wall of blindness, but when you do, it resonates.

    Class should too but it doesn’t.

    So you see vids like I saw posted where a 12 year old girl argues with her parents about the BLM protests. The parents loudly claim it’s just lazy people who want to live off the system, and she protests that no, there’s real racial injustice.

    Ask the same 12 year old girl about the Occupy movement and of course, she has no idea what it’s about.

    Race issues then can form alliances across a wide spectrum of people, including elites. Class issues threaten elites and blind most regular folks–unless it takes the form of resenting liberal elites for their privilege, which of course they do have.

    That’s me in 3 minutes of uniformed improvisation. On this I want to hear a lot of voices and what others think.

    ….

    #116231
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    ZN,

    Thanks for reposting those links. Will try to remember the chat option.

    I know you mentioned there were obvious reasons for the inability to form effective coalitions on the basis of “class.” But I think the topic is still worth hashing out, despite the potential for stating the obvious.

    It’s always struck me as baffling that when America and most of the West was far less unequal, economically — during the 1960s — it seemed easier to form those coalitions. Just three people today — Bezos, Gates and Zuckerburg — control more wealth than the bottom half of the nation combined . . . and CEOs routinely make hundreds to thousands of times their rank and file. That would have been unthinkable when MLK and RFK talked about economic justice for Americans, and the young, especially, demanded economic equality.

    It’s complicated, complex, etc. etc. . . . but I still think it’s important to discuss. Why then, but not now? Today’s 99% has never been further away from the 1%. Economic hierarchies have never been this steep. The system hasn’t been this plutocrat-friendly since the first Gilded Age, etc.

    Strange days, these.

    Just improvising here, without much depth to it. But I think in different ways people are blind to both class and race.

    The difference is, that racial issues can potentially touch on people’s almost innate dedication to ideas of human rights and equality before the law. It resonates. You have to crack through a wall of blindness, but when you do, it resonates.

    Class should too but it doesn’t.

    So you see vids like I saw posted where a 12 year old girl argues with her parents about the BLM protests. The parents loudly claim it’s just lazy people who want to live off the system, and she protests that no, there’s real racial injustice.

    Ask the same 12 year old girl about the Occupy movement and of course, she has no idea what it’s about.

    Race issues then can form alliances across a wide spectrum of people, including elites. Class issues threaten elites and blind most regular folks–unless it takes the form of resenting liberal elites for their privilege, which of course they do have.

    That’s me in 3 minutes of uniformed improvisation. On this I want to hear a lot of voices and what others think.

    ….

    The UK recognizes and understands class very well. I don’t think a lot of Americans even think it exists here, or if it does, believe it’s something that can be overcome. “If you simply work hard enough…” Maybe the “rugged individualism” we’re bathed in from birth prevents us from seeing it, or at least greatly lessens its perceived importance.

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by nittany ram.
    #116242
    wv
    Participant

    <
    To be honest I am surprised that my friends in this thread don’t see the good news part, which is that we have had sustained, huge, widespread protests against police brutality for the first time…well since I can even remember. That means, among other things, that a majority believe the Floyd killing points to systemic racism. 4 years ago the majority did NOT believe things like that….

    =================

    Well, Mack sees it the way you do, i think.

    I’m too far gone.

    I think every city will have a different outcome. In some cities there will be some significant changes, concerning the police and race. In other cities, there will be talk, and virtue-signaling, but no real change.

    I’m pleased there will be some measure of change,
    in some places,
    concerning race.

    There will be no significant change concerning class. Which is the big killer. Imperialism is a reflection of the Capitalist-Class-system. So black and brown people will continue to be droned-to-death every week by mass-murdering-Presidents of both mass-murdering-corporate-parties. There will be no mass protests about Imperialism. Etc, etc, and so forth.

    I’m too far gone.

    w
    v
    “He who despairs of the human condition is a coward, but he who has hope for it is a fool.”
    — Albert Camus

    #116250
    zn
    Moderator

    Aragorn: Haleth son of Háma…there is always hope.

Viewing 19 posts - 1 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.