politics & the virus

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House politics & the virus

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #112278
    zn
    Moderator

    Republicans Tried to Sneak Abortion Restrictions into the Coronavirus Bill
    Anti-choice lawmakers are stalling emergency legislation.

    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/4ag55g/republicans-coronavirus-emergency-legislation-abortion-restrictions?fbclid=IwAR3xCUFgeRbUGfxgl1H4EDcaeGlSiklCMWQcN4EkVLNwUm5awmKZd-w5uEI

    The tensions reportedly revolved around the Hyde Amendment, a decades-old provision that blocks federal funds from going to abortion services, preventing millions of low-income Americans on Medicaid from accessing abortion care.

    According to conservative media, some top Republicans believed a stipulation in the House bill requiring the government to reimburse private laboratories doing coronavirus testing could effectively overturn the Hyde Amendment by establishing a government funding stream not subject to the restrictions. In response, anti-choice lawmakers insisted on including language in the legislation that would reaffirm the principles of the amendment.

    #112280
    zn
    Moderator

    Chris Murphy@ChrisMurphyCT
    Imagine the hourly worker with a low fever and cough, but no paid sick leave. He can’t afford to miss a day’s paycheck. He’s thinking of going to work Monday.

    There’s a bill, sitting on the Senate floor RIGHT NOW, that solves his problem.

    But McConnell says the bill can wait?

    #112289
    zn
    Moderator

    #112292
    zn
    Moderator

    Mel Moorer Rainbow flag@knownforms
    For those of you who didn’t live through AIDS killing 25,000 people while your president laughed and joked about it and did nothing before the government even acknowledged the disease, we’ve seen this before. For those of us reliving this trauma, know that your pain is real.

    #112307
    zn
    Moderator

    #112316
    zn
    Moderator

    ‘Stealth Attack on Social Security’: Trump Condemned for Exploiting Coronavirus Crisis to Push Payroll Tax Cut

    from Facebook:

    Bob Metzger: I dug deeper into this, and the “payroll tax cut” that he has proposed is simply and solely an elimination of the Social Security tax paycheck deductions, and evidently both the employer and employee halves. So, regardless of any positive affect it might have, it would severely accelerate the demise of the Social Security system. So, seniors who rely on the monthly checks from the system that they paid into for ~50 years, to live indoors and eat, would soon be SOL, and likely told they should have planned better. Yet those who DID accumulate savings of their own over those same 50+ years have seen them battered over the past few weeks by the 20%+ drop in the equities markets. He must be relying on this virus to pretty much wipe out huge numbers of us gov’t-teat-sucking, unproductive retirees…

    #112336
    zn
    Moderator

    #112337
    zn
    Moderator

    #112351
    zn
    Moderator

    #112354
    zn
    Moderator

    Disabled vet fighting U.S. propaganda@100_Disable_vet
    Healthcare Industry stock went up about $40 billion the day after Super Tuesday.

    Somebody is praying for a Biden Presidency and it’s not the 87 million people uninsured or under insured

    #112358
    zn
    Moderator

    How the coronavirus crisis revealed the danger of the decades-long conservative movement

    link https://www.alternet.org/2020/03/how-the-coronavirus-crisis-revealed-the-danger-of-the-decades-long-conservative-movement/?fbclid=IwAR3iRJu9lkt5LLJp70djSmU1MqwlOZGNwVsEkypVyU7CL3u8-thzqXzraXY

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell smelled an evil liberal conspiracy on Thursday, one designed to steal away his decades of tireless work to kneecap the federal government. The Democratic-majority House had passed a large emergency bill, designed to combat the coronavirus pandemic, and McConnell was absolutely certain Democrats, led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, were trying to pull one over on him.

    “Unfortunately, it appears at this hour that the speaker and House Democrats instead chose to produce an ideological wish list that was not tailored closely to the circumstances,” McConnell said. He accused Democrats of exploiting this situation, saying the bill addresses “various areas of policy that are barely related, if at all, to the issue before us.”

    There’s a lot at stake here, but apparently the big sticking point for McConnell was a provision requiring employers to offer paid sick leave to employees, which McConnell claims would “put thousands of small businesses at risk.”

    In reality, of course, this is just common sense. As the New York Times editorial board noted, companies that don’t offer paid sick leave “are endangering their workers and customers.” A lot of workers with public-facing jobs — such as food service workers and retail employees — come into close contact with dozens or hundreds of people a day. But they are the people least likely to be allowed to stay home without losing their jobs, or at least losing a paycheck.

    McConnell is so poisoned by his right-wing ideology that he can’t see this, or chooses not to. Instead, he’s standing firm on the long-standing Republican tendency to view employers as feudal lords who should be allowed to treat employees however they wish — even, apparently, if that means allowing a deadly disease to rip through the population, potentially killing hundreds of thousands of people if it is not checked.

    So far, most of the panic over the coronavirus outbreak has been driven by the undeniable incompetence of Donald Trump. At every turn, Trump has made this situation worse — even going so far as to try to discourage testing to bamboozle the public and, I suspect, tanking the markets by screwing up an Oval Office address because he’s too vain to wear glasses so he can see well enough to read a teleprompter.

    That’s all true. But it’s also important to understand that the larger Republican Party, even without Trump, is also to blame for what looks to be a serious public health crisis. Right-wing ideology, often marketed as “rugged individualism” but perhaps better understood as an aversion to the very concept of a common good, is one major reason why the U.S. government, hamstrung for decades by Republican power, isn’t better equipped to handle a crisis.

    This isn’t just a Trump problem. This is a widespread Republican problem. For decades, GOP strategy has been consistent: Whenever they get power, they slash regulations and gut spending, with the goal of making government less effective. This is a deliberate strategy to make the public broadly distrustful of government, and therefore increasingly open to shifting more and more power to the wealthy individuals who control the private sector.

    This ideological commitment to an every-man-for-himself ideology, which is terrible in any circumstances, is exposed as particularly dreadful in the face of a pandemic. Disease is a reminder that humans are a herd species, wholly dependent on each other for survival, and that government must be a way to formally organize that joint survival pattern. It’s not some villain in a racism-inflected right-wing morality fable about the importance of “personal responsibility.”

    Simply put, we need our government to be able to protect us from disease. Republicans have spent years tearing it down, and even in a crisis are incapable of accepting that “small government” is not always a good thing.

    As Max Moran at Talking Points Memo argued, the fact that Vice President Mike Pence — deemed a “normal” Republican — is in charge of the coronavirus comforts some people, because they believe he is more adult and responsible than Trump. Pence’s track record suggests otherwise. As governor of Indiana, he oversaw an HIV outbreak that led to 10% of the population people in a single county becoming infected because Pence thought preaching the value of personal responsibility was better than following the recommendations of public health experts.

    “[A] Pence-led response is dangerous, not in spite of, but precisely because he is a typical Republican,” Moran writes, because normal Republicans “apply their competence and considerable resources” to the task of “protection for the powerful, callousness for the afflicted, and a special disdain for the ‘other.’”

    The right-wing idiocy that is going to get people killed is all over the Republican response to this situation. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy joined McConnell in denouncing the Democratic bill, even though everything in it — including expanding food-stamp spending — will either help slow the spread of the disease or stimulate the American economy to offset the inevitable slowdown caused by this epidemic.

    Instead, McCarthy is resorting to racism instead of sensible public health measures, calling the coronavirus the “Chinese coronavirus” for no apparent purpose except to feed the assumptions of the Fox News base than their whiteness and their racist attitudes will somehow protect them. (This assumption, by the way, is leading many older Americans to take serious and completely unnecessary risks with their health.)

    The right-wing ideology poisoning is so bad that the coronavirus bill was held up in part because Republicans wanted to inject some anti-abortion language into it. There is absolutely no reason to believe that helping people protect themselves against a viral epidemic will lead to more abortions, but that’s the modern GOP for you: They’re always worried that somehow or other the Democrats have a sneaky agenda to “let” women have sex. (Which women will undoubtedly do, whether the Democrats authorize it or not.)

    Even the so-called Republican “moderates” are to blame for this situation. For instance, Politico reporter Michael Grunwald uncovered this little tidbit about Sen. Susan Collins of Maine from his book about the Obama era.

    Zooming out, it’s easy to see how decades of damage to our government are likely to make this epidemic worse. Republicans have been stingy about health care spending and have blocked Democratic efforts to increase access, especially when it comes to the Medicaid expansion under the Obama administration. The result is that we have fewer doctors and hospitals ready to handle what we know is coming, and we will probably have a lot of infected people who won’t get tested, either because they can’t afford it or don’t even know where to go for testing and treatment.

    By all means, blame Trump for the current crisis. His incompetence is especially central to the panicked reaction of the financial markets. Even a slightly steadier president, whatever his or her party or ideology, would bolster investor confidence a whole lot more.

    But this isn’t just about Trump. Republicans have a profound hostility to good government, and whatever slapdash response they may grudgingly accept in an effort to save their skins at the ballot box this November will be hamstrung by the fact that they refused, for decades, to invest in the infrastructure necessary to weather the big shock that is hitting us right now. Viruses are the ultimate reminder that humans are interconnected and need each other, and that the ideal of “rugged individualism” is childish and often racist nonsense.

    #112375
    wv
    Participant

    #112376
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Whole Foods is apparently asking its workers to share their PTO with employees impacted by Covid-19.

    (Paid Time Off).

    Instead of just covering them out of corporate funds, Mackey, the CEO, wants rank and file employees to do the sacrificing themselves.

    I don’t know yet if this is an order from on high. As in, from Bezos. Mackey sold the company to him but remains the CEO, apparently.

    Now that this is public knowledge, I wonder how long before the spin and the cleanup on aisle 19, etc.

    #112383
    wv
    Participant

    So, has Trump blamed this on Obama yet? Has he blamed it on Communists yet?

    w
    v

    #112450
    zn
    Moderator

    ==

    Governors are angry at Trump over coronavirus. That’s ominous.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/16/governors-are-angry-trump-over-coronavirus-thats-ominous/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

    It’s being widely reported that President Trump angered some of the nation’s governors by telling them on a private call that they should not wait for the federal government’s help in trying to fill increasing demand for respirators for people diagnosed with the coronavirus.

    I’ve learned a bit more about this call, and it may have been worse than what has been reported.

    One of the governors — Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico — laid into Trump in a sharp, pointed and passionate manner, her communications director, Tripp Stelnicki, told me.

    The good news is that Lujan Grisham got results — or, at least, a promise of more cooperation. According to Stelnicki, Vice President Pence has since called Lujan Grisham and pledged to work with her to supply what she needs to handle the state’s response.

    This is ominous, because it underscores the lengths to which governors will have to go to get the help they need from the federal government — with items that should arguably be no-brainers already at this point in the process.

    Trump’s call with governors got some attention after the New York Times reported this startling tidbit:

    “Respirators, ventilators, all of the equipment — try getting it yourselves,” Mr. Trump told the governors during the conference call, a recording of which was shared with The New York Times.
    “We will be backing you, but try getting it yourselves. Point of sales, much better, much more direct if you can get it yourself.”

    According to the Times, Lujan Grisham told Trump: “If one state doesn’t get the resources and materials they need, the entire nation continues to be at risk.”

    But according to Lujan Grisham’s spokesman, she went further than that. The sticking point for Lujan Grisham was not just over respirators; she told Trump that she needs more processing chemicals from the federal government to carry out testing on the ramped-up scale she wants to see, Stelnicki told me.

    And Lujan Grisham, a Democrat, was particularly frustrated by Trump’s seeming disengagement from needs such as these, Stelnicki said.

    Still, Stelnicki said that in the end, the fact that Pence got back in touch with Lujan Grisham is cause for optimism.

    “She made the point passionately that we expect access to these things, and Pence said they were going to help get it done,” Stelnicki told me. He confirmed that the state has 21 confirmed cases of coronavirus and has done around 1,200 tests — but wants to dramatically expand testing as quickly as possible.

    The reason this is so worrisome is that it’s now been nearly two months since Trump made his first public comments about coronavirus, on Jan. 22, when he claimed that “we have it totally under control.” Yet testing still is lagging horribly behind, some eight weeks later.

    Remember, Anthony S. Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases who has functioned as a kind of decoder of the administration’s ongoing response, has conceded that the inability to get testing underway faster was a serious “failing.”

    And Fauci has even declined to say whether the delayed response may have been responsible for placing us on a path to a spike in coronavirus cases akin to that in Italy, which means it very well might have.

    Yet despite all this, governors are still wrangling with the federal government to get the basic supplies needed to ramp up this most basic aspect of our response. That’s not a good sign, is it?

    #112466
    zn
    Moderator

    SENATE MAY NOT PASS CORONAVIRUS PAID SICK LEAVE ANYTIME SOON BECAUSE GOP OPPOSES SICK LEAVE COSTS

    https://www.newsweek.com/senate-may-not-pass-coronavirus-paid-sick-leave-anytime-soon-because-gop-opposes-sick-leave-costs-1492566?fbclid=IwAR1XjXWPtgEWmIKVrTHhqZo6EYj0W7PdFb4uEeyrb9wPqRd9FzQuwWrEbDE

    The bipartisan stimulus package approved by the House over the weekend that was designed to alleviate economic stress on workers amid the coronavirus pandemic likely won’t be immediately passed by the Senate when members return Monday afternoon.

    Although the bill, which includes requiring certain companies to provide paid sick leave and the government to give free virus testing and food aid, was supported by the majority of House Republicans and received the backing of President Donald Trump, hurdles remain with Senate Republicans.

    “I fear that rather than offering a workable solution, the House bill will exacerbate the problem by forcing small businesses to pay wages they cannot afford and ‘helping’ them go further into debt,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said in a statement over the weekend. He suggested existing state unemployment funds should be used instead.

    “I hope the Senate will approach this with a level head and pass a bill that does more good than harm—or, if it won’t, pass nothing at all,” Johnson added.

    Some GOP senators have expressed concerns over the cost to smaller businesses for offering employees two weeks of paid sick leave, the time period in which health officials say it could take for someone with the virus to begin experiencing symptoms.

    “We shouldn’t be imposing a big, new federal mandate on businesses that are struggling to stay alive in the midst of the coronavirus outbreak,” Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), chairman of the health committee, said last week.

    The worry among Republicans persists despite Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who worked with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to come to an agreement on the stimulus bill, saying the legislation provides relief to businesses who may be fiscally strained by paid sick leave. It provides a dollar-for-dollar reimbursement for coronavirus related sick leave costs, he said, adding that Treasury will “use its regulatory authority to advance funds to employers.” That includes making advances to small businesses and for employers to use cash deposited with the IRS.

    Although Trump backed the bill and Mnuchin and Pelosi spent days negotiating its terms, the president signaled Monday that the Senate won’t simply accept the relief legislation and will make changes. “We may go back and forth with the House,” he said.

    Because the Senate is already addressing a FISA surveillance bill with a procedural vote Monday night that was already passed by the House, the chamber would need unanimous consent to turn its attention toward the coronavirus bill. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said over the weekend that they are “carefully reviewing the details” of the stimulus package and will act after it receives the final version from the House.

    And there remains another source of delay. Due to technical changes the House needs to still make to the bill’s text—likely the result of last-minute edits made before lawmakers voted around 12:30 a.m. Saturday—it will need to pass the legislation again, likely by unanimous consent because the chamber is on recess this week. Any member could prevent this from happening. Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) has threatened to do so until he’s about to read the final version in full.

    Louie Gohmert@replouiegohmert
    We still do not have a final draft of the negotiated changes being called ’technical corrections’ and some of us believe that the newly worded laws should be finished before we pass them. #CoronaVirus

    “We’re still waiting on the House to reach a decision on technical corrections and submit a final product to us,” McConnell said Monday.

    But in the Senate, Democrats and some Republicans have advocated for the swift and immediate passage of stimulus legislation amid heightened fears that a recession is inevitable thanks to a spiraling stock market, and nationwide school and business closures.

    “FISA needs to be carefully reviewed. That takes time. That can wait,” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) wrote in a tweet. “The emergency response to #coronavirus should be the first order of business in the Senate tomorrow. There is no reason for this to take days & days.”

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has chastised McConnell for allowing senators to leave Thursday and not return until Monday afternoon. The chamber scrapped a previously scheduled recess this week to address FISA and coronavirus.

    “We cannot wait,” Schumer said in a floor speech Monday. “It was my preference to keep the senate in session over the weekend so that we could have passed this bill already, but Leader McConnell, regrettably and almost inexplicably, decided to send everyone home and then call them back today.”

    Congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle have agreed that no matter the fate of the paid sick leave legislation, there will be future economic stimulus measures to come in the near future.

    #112511
    wv
    Participant

    Trump:https://truthout.org/articles/trump-administration-seeks-exclusive-rights-to-potential-coronavirus-vaccine/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=5ce9288f-d780-421b-b4a0-cfca54ee1fff
    Trump Administration Seeks Exclusive Rights to Potential Coronavirus Vaccine

    German lawmakers and government officials voiced outrage at reporting Sunday that the Trump administration is seeking to secure exclusive rights to a potential coronavirus vaccine being developed by the German firm CureVac as the pandemic spreads and takes lives across the globe.

    The German newspaper Welt am Sonntag, citing an anonymous German government official, reported Sunday that the Trump administration offered CureVac $1 billion to hand the U.S. exclusive rights to a potential COVID-19 vaccine.

    Trump wants the vaccine “only for the USA,” the German official said. The New York Times confirmed late Sunday that the Trump administration attempted to persuade CureVac to move its research to the U.S., offering the company what one German official described as a “large sum” of money.

    “Germany is not for sale,” economy minister Peter Altmaier declared in response to the bombshell reporting, which White House officials said was overblown.

    “International cooperation is important now, not national self-interest,” said conservative lawmaker Erwin Rueddel, a member of the German parliament’s health committee….see link

    #112620
    wv
    Participant

    #112799
    wv
    Participant

    Cuba doing a good job?
    ————————

    #112805
    zn
    Moderator

    #112808
    Billy_T
    Participant

    I’m calling on the Federal Government to nationalize the medical supply chain.

    The Federal Government should immediately use the Defense Production Act to order companies to make gowns, masks and gloves.

    Currently, states are competing against other states for supplies.

    — Andrew Cuomo

    The capitalist system is obviously useless in a crisis like this. It’s set up to “compete” with everyone for resources, money, etc. etc. Instead of all hands on deck, its guiding ethos and everyone row against each other, in different directions.

    Singing to the choir, I know. But it really, really pizzes me off.

    It can’t make money in prevention. It actually loses money when we prevent catastrophes which it exploits. It can’t make money building up “rainy day” resources/stockpiles. It has to sell, sell, sell!! It can’t make money, cooperatively, working for the common good, which almost always means leaving stuff in the Commons, for public use, instead of private gain.

    It created this crisis and it doesn’t even want to resolve it. No percentage in it, as that parallel world gangster once said on Star Trek.

    #112809
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Excellent video by Klein.

    I wish she were an American. She would make an awesome president.

    At the very least, the Dems should put her in charge of the Interior Department or the EPA, if they win.

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.