Why Dems lost the debates

Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Public House › Why Dems lost the debates

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 17, 2017 at 12:34 pm #66380
    Zooey
    Participant

    https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/03/debate-versus-persuasion

    March 17, 2017 at 5:59 pm #66383
    wv
    Participant

    “…Bernie Sanders offers a good illustration of what I mean about using language effectively by going beyond reason and incorporating character and emotion. I long thought Sanders would be particularly effective in a debate against Donald Trump, far more so than Hillary Clinton. That was not because Sanders has a more acute command of debater’s logic than Clinton; in fact, she’s far better at this. Rather, it’s because Sanders had those other two appeals: the emotional appeal and the character appeal. Sanders could very effectively describe meeting people without health insurance, and speak with moral conviction about the plight of the underclass, and he could fundamentally get people to trust him by having a kind of personal integrity that many people respected. (Hardly anybody respects the character of either Clinton or Trump.) Democrats need to not just be right on the facts, but to have candidates that can speak to people on an emotional level, and who seem to have the kind of human traits in which people can place their confidence…”

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.