Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Three & Out: An Early Look at 2016 QBs
- This topic has 54 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 22, 2015 at 11:49 am #34086AgamemnonParticipant
Three & Out: An Early Look at the 2016 NFL Draft’s Quarterbacks
http://draftbreakdown.com/three-out-an-early-look-at-the-2016-nfl-drafts-quarterbacks/2/
Written by Bryan Perez on November 12, 2015
GOFF, Jared | Cal | #16
-Still the top quarterback on my Board despite some problematic turnovers and less than stellar play over the last few weeks. If Goff decides to turn pro, then I’ll dig much deeper into the film that he’s compiled over the last two seasons…especially over the last few weeks. That said, the film that I have evaluated so far suggests that Goff is the most talented passer in this class whose arm is plenty strong enough to start and succeed in the pros. He’s being over-scouted right now, which is actually a good sign for him; it means he’s performed well enough to draw the attention of just about every NFL Draft analyst in the country. Player stock goes through peaks and valleys throughout the draft process, and right now Goff is experiencing one of those valleys (much like Mariota endured around this time last year). He’s a very good quarterback. Period.
COOK, Connor | Michigan State | #18
-Arguably the highest floor, lowest ceiling quarterback in the class. He doesn’t wow you with any one particularly great trait, but he also doesn’t have any overwhelming, glaring flaw. He’s an experienced player with better than average production and a NFL-worthy arm. My biggest concern is his lacking completion percentage. No, I’m not a box score scout, but when a player is consistently under the 60% completion mark, it’s reason to be concerned. All that said, I do believe that he has enough positives in his game to feel comfortable in the assessment that he’ll challenge for a starting job in his rookie season.
Day Two:
LYNCH, Paxton | Memphis | #12
-Lynch has been the hot name in the NFL Draft community over the last month or so, and for good reason. He’s having a fantastic statistical season and is putting a good year of tape together from a developmental standpoint. That said, I’m not quite as sold on Lynch as the masses appear to be. Yes, he’s an impressive measureables guy who also has the kind of athletic attributes that, when combined with his physical makeup, is really appealing. But in my exposure to Lynch, I’ve noted too many unimpressive throws to feel comfortable with placing him in the first-round tier. I have a lot more tape to watch, and I reserve the right to bump Lynch up a bit if the games I haven’t seen are the ones that have propelled him into “Draft Twitter’s” favorites.
BRISSETT, Jacoby | NC State | #12
-Brissett was one of the more impressive quarterbacks that I evaluated over the summer, and it’s no surprise to me that he is having a productive 2015 season (64% completion percentage, 14:2 TD/Int ratio). He’s big, he’s mobile and he has the arm talent required to start in the NFL. One of his best attributes is his ability to escape the pocket; he’s very “Big Ben-like” in that defenders have a hard time wrangling him to the ground. He’s powerful and agile enough to keep plays alive by breaking tackles in the pocket and firing the ball downfield. Sometimes, however, the ball placement just isn’t good enough, and as a result, I’m not sure he’s going to be ready to start in the NFL right away. I do think he’ll get a starting gig at some point, likely three years or so into his career.
Day Three:
DOUGHTY, Brandon | Western Kentucky | #12
-Doughty is having an incredibly productive 6th season on campus. He’s already thrown for 3,583 yards and 34 TDs, a year removed from a 2014 season when he compiled 4,830 yards and an astounding 49 TDs. He has some serious medical red flags and doesn’t necessarily present with starter’s tools, but every time I watch him I come away impressed with his pocket presence and overall demeanor on the field; he’s always calm and composed. Guys like Doughty — not the most physically gifted but who are confident and mentally tough — tend to stick around for quite a while. I think he can become an important backup/spot starter in the NFL. He could conceivably go undrafted because of his injury history, but at this point in the process, I’m a fan.
HACKENBERG, Christian | Penn State | #14
-I started the 2015 season with the mindset that I would forget everything that I thought I knew about Hackenberg. I wanted to give him a fair chance to make a new impression on me regarding his NFL grade. And while Hackenberg has had some positive moments this year, he’s just too wildly inconsistent from a mechanics and results standpoint to put much trust in him as a future starter in the pros. I get the fact that Hackenberg might be a “square peg in a round hole” with the offense in place at Penn State, but at some point natural talent has to take over. Hackenberg has one-hopped and skipped way too many passes in the short game and has fluttered too many dying ducks in the long game to suggest he’s the star he once looked like a few years ago. That said, the talent he flashed as a freshman should get him drafted somewhere toward the end of day three.
BOYKIN, Trevone | TCU | #2
-One of college football’s most exciting players, Boykin started the year with a lot to prove from a passing standpoint. It’s become what seems like a yearly tradition for some of the most productive college quarterbacks to end their collegiate careers with questions about whether they can play the position in the NFL. We’ve seen players like Tim Tebow get drafted high and fail, while others like Tyrod Taylor nearly slip through the NFL Draft cracks only to evolve into a very sound starter in the pros. Boykin has certainly shown development as a pocket passer in 2015, but I haven’t seen enough to justify moving him into the day two tier. I’m not going to grade him as a talent that requires a position change; he’s a quarterback and needs to be given a shot on the next level to continue his maturation as a passer. At worst, you’re adding a useful offensive weapon by bringing Boykin into the fold.
SUDFELD, Nate | Indiana | #7
-A big, deceptively athletic quarterback with a strong arm. Sudfeld is a player who will pick up steam as the draft process unfolds. He’s flying under the radar a little bit and if he can find himself in a post-season all star game, his big arm and good looking frame will make his stock bubble up.
WENTZ, Carson | North Dakota State | #11
-An impressive athlete who proved to be a dangerous dual threat in 2014 and was on his way for similar success this year before a wrist injury ended his season. Wentz has already been invited to the Senior Bowl; he’s the kind of player who can dictate where he ends up getting picked if he has a strong showing during the week of practices in Mobile. He only has about 1.5 years of starter’s tape, so scouts will naturally be hesitant to give him a higher than day-three grade. He’s displayed plenty of arm strength and accuracy between last year and the start of ’15, but he’s an incomplete evaluation for me until the all star circuit gets going. I rarely let those events overwhelm my final grade, but in the case of Wentz, it will be critically important for him.
KESSLER, Cody | USC | #6
-The Trojans’ starter is worthy of a draft pick if you’re looking for a guy who can be a solid backup quarterback on a team with an established veteran starter. Kessler has played at a high level on a big stage for his whole career, so he appears ready from a pressure standpoint to handle all that comes with playing in the NFL. I’m just not sold on his arm. Plain and simple. Spot starter, fill in for an injured veteran? Ok. Draft him with the intent that he’ll be your long-term answer at the position? No. At least, not on my Board.
PRESCOTT, Dak | Mississippi State | #15
-If you’re looking for a quarterback who is the best candidate to change positions in the NFL, it’s Dak Prescott. Similar to Logan Thomas from a few drafts ago, Prescott offers his most value when he’s tucking and running downfield. He’s a powerful guy who can break arm tackles much like a running back in the open field. With the NFL trending toward big, strong and fast athletes playing the tight end position, Prescott could be a perfect fit. He’s already been invited to the Senior Bowl, so it’ll be fun to get an up close and personal look at him. Maybe he impresses as a passer and keeps his dream of playing quarterback alive. I just wouldn’t bet on it.
DRISKEL, Jeff | LA Tech | #6
-What a difference a change of scenery can make for a player. Driskell was all but dead as a NFL prospect during his forgettable tenure at Florida. Then came 2015. He’s having his best season — by far — as a quarterback and has resurfaced as a potentially draftable talent.
May 22, 2015 at 11:49 am #25101znModeratorfrom off the net
==
Flipper336
———-
Christian Hackenberg, Penn State (7.9 Top 5)
Reminds me of Elway. I certainly see very SIMILAR arm talent (Elway might be the best I have ever seen) and Hack has that type of toughness in spades. Also has the “I don’t give a bleep what happened before the 4th quarter/last drive, we are going to win this game” mentality.
The mobility is the big difference I see in an overall assessment.
Absolutely no conscience on throws. Desperately wants to make plays and trusts that his teammates have the same desire. Lightning quick release and his ball has lots of zip to all levels. Fits balls in EXTREMELY tight windows (recievers consistently got zero separation). Accuracy short is only average because of footwork (all arm, legs very straight) but it really goes up intermediate and deep because he sets his feet and gets some bend in his knees. Footwork improves DRAMATICLY when playing under center…quick in his drop, sets up with a strong base, and throws in great rhythm. Tends to stand flat footed taking a ball in the shotgun. Better when his feet are active. Wants to let plays develop and read deep to short (wants chunk plays)…doesn’t seem to like the quick one read short pass/smoke screen/spread type passes (always seems to at least peek deeper). Good pocket movement, zero unnecessary movement, will take the big shot and still deliver the pass (no fear), and can run only enough to steal a first down. Has a bad habit of throwing off his back foot when all options are exhausted and the rush is closing in. Still trying to make a play when he’d be better off throwing it away or taking a sack. Appears immune to the pressure of situations
SET UP AND POCKET AWARENESS – 10 (76) 60
8
-quickness to release from under center into three-, five-, or seven-step drops with mobility and foot quickness with balance.
+++
-chin on shoulder for backside awareness
+
-mobility in pocket to elude and avoid…hitch, hitch slide and throw
+
-feel pocket pressure
+
-strength in pocket
+++
-does he know when to run/throw
++
-roll out left and right
0
-square shoulders on the move
0
-does he drift in the pocket?
NoFIELD VISION/DEFENSE AND COVERAGE RECOGNITION – 10
7
-pre snap defensive reads/ability to identify the Mike linebacker, low safety or corner from slot and change protection
+
-blitz recognition
+
-ability to audible or change play at the line of scrimmage
?
-finding primary and secondary receivers
++
-coverage recognition on the move
+
-quick and accurate reads
++
-proper progression
++
-timing
++ACCURACY AND TOUCH – 10
7
-throwing all types of passing variations, trajectory, and ability to spin ball while taking off some strength.
+++
-short: catchable balls thrown where defenders can’t make a play, squeeze into window, screen/swing passes
0
-intermediate/long: Stick it on receiver, deep-ball placement, squeeze over linebacker in front of safeties.
+++DELIVERY AND RELEASE – 8
6
-type of release (over ear, sidearm, pitcher release on post leg, elongated motion)
+++
-upper-body passer lacks weight transfer?
Short-Yes Long-No
-foot placement/balance
++
-release quickness
+++
-follow through
++
-throw from different platforms?
YesARM STRENGTH – 8
7
-live arm?
Yes
-intermediate velocity/zip
++++
-long velocity/zip
+++
-tightness of spiral
++
-wind up deep?
No
-balls lose interest?
NoLEADERSHIP AND POISE – 6
5
-commands respect, raises expectation while elevating the play of teammates?
+++
-composure and the ability to perform in pressure situations
+++
-not forcing balls into double or triple coverage
!
-ability and confidence to consistently deliver big plays under pressure
+++
-smart decisions in time out management, milk clock before snapping ball
+++
-4th quarter
+++BALL HANDLING – 4
3
-hand size
-under center transfer
+++
-selling play action
+
-smooth with eyes downfield
+++
-where does the QB hold the ball
0RUNNING ABILITY- 4
1
-scrambling
!
-ability to run downhill with production
!
-big-play runner
!!!
-yards after contact
0POTENTIAL – 10 (16) 16
-if utilized in ideal scenario
10HEIGHT/WEIGHT – 6
-for a particular position
67.5 +Top 5 pick
7.0 – 7.4 Top 25
6.5 – 6.9 Top 50
5.7 – 6.4 Top 100
5.4 – 5.6 Top 150
4.5 – 5.3 UDFA—
Connor Cook, Michigan State (6.8 Top 50)
Cook is a step below as a pure thrower but at least as good as Winston with a better/quicker delivery.
Quick set up and quicker release. Zero fear of tight windows at any level and does a great job making it work. When not in rhythm or rushed his lower body reacts after his arm motion causing scattershot accuracy. Will “aim” some passes in a negative way with time. Wants to make plays from the pocket but will sense pressure early and often creates real pressure because of it. Nice active feet but the rest of his movement could be described as jittery. Overall needs to calm his movements and head. If he does? High first is easily possible
QUARTERBACK GRADING
SET UP AND POCKET AWARENESS – 10 (60) 39
5
-quickness to release from under center into three-, five-, or seven-step drops with mobility and foot quickness with balance.
+++
-chin on shoulder for backside awareness
+
-mobility in pocket to elude and avoid…hitch, hitch slide and throw
0
-feel pocket pressure
!
-strength in pocket
+
-does he know when to run/throw
++
-roll out left and right
++
-square shoulders on the move
+
-does he drift in the pocket?
YesFIELD VISION/DEFENSE AND COVERAGE RECOGNITION – 10
6
-pre snap defensive reads/ability to identify the Mike linebacker, low safety or corner from slot and change protection
++
-blitz recognition
+
-ability to audible or change play at the line of scrimmage
+
-finding primary and secondary receivers
++
-coverage recognition on the move.
++
-quick and accurate reads
++
-proper progression
++
-timing
++ACCURACY AND TOUCH – 10
7
-throwing all types of passing variations, trajectory, and ability to spin ball while taking off some strength.
+++
-short: catchable balls thrown where defenders can’t make a play, squeeze into window, screen/swing passes
+
-intermediate/long: Stick it on receiver, deep-ball placement, squeeze over linebacker in front of safeties.
++DELIVERY AND RELEASE – 8
7
-type of release (over ear, sidearm, pitcher release on post leg, elongated motion)
+++
-upper-body passer lacks weight transfer?
At times
-foot placement/balance
Inconsistent
-release quickness
+++
-follow through
+
-throw from different platforms?
YesARM STRENGTH – 8
5
-live arm?
Yes
-intermediate velocity/zip
+
-long velocity/zip
+
-tightness of spiral
++
-wind up deep?
No
-balls lose interest?
At timesLEADERSHIP AND POISE – 6
4
-commands respect, raises expectation while elevating the play of teammates?
Yes
-composure and the ability to perform in pressure situations
++
-not forcing balls into double or triple coverage
!!
-ability and confidence to consistently deliver big plays under pressure
++
-smart decisions in time out management, milk clock before snapping ball
+
-4th quarter
++BALL HANDLING – 4
3
-hand size
-under center transfer
++
-selling play action
+
-smooth with eyes downfield
++
-where does the QB hold the ball
++RUNNING ABILITY- 4
2
-scrambling
++
-ability to run downhill with production
0
-big-play runner
!!
-yards after contact
0POTENTIAL – 10 (16) 13
8
-if utilized in ideal scenarioHEIGHT/WEIGHT – 6
5
-for a particular position7.5 +Top 5 pick
7.0 – 7.4 Top 25
6.5 – 6.9 Top 50
5.7 – 6.4 Top 100
5.4 – 5.6 Top 150
4.5 – 5.3 UDFA—-
Cardale Jones, Ohio State (6.4 Top 100)
Many of Jones questions are fixable (ball, handling, pocket patience/awareness) with time and starts. His offense will still leave lingering questions also but his arm talent is rare. In the top tier of deep ball throwers I have ever seen. Also his throws on the move…I think it was vs Wisconsin (outstanding overall game for him), he was rolling right and his receiver fell down, he adjusted his angle and threw a pinpoint pass to the guy on the ground. I like guys that are aggressive also and I doubt we will ever see that aggressiveness short and intermediate from Jones because of that offense.
*Offense makes complete evaluation difficult/incomplete. Lots of quick read and run options. Extremely good at throwing on the run. Squares shoulders, gets from point A to B with eyes downfield, and throws accurate passes with zip. Senses pressure early and his normal reaction is to back up or completely bail, not slide/move in the pocket . Throws almost exclusively to very open receivers short and intermediate. Outstanding deep ball with great touch, air, and timing. Will throw the ball away. Showed good confidence stepping into a tough situation but also had a great cast around him. Solid delivery. Extremely strong arm. Careless when handling the ball with several sloppy plays. Tank when running but not a threat for big yards consistently as a runner. Obviously raw talent with almost limitless potential that could really skyrocket up or fall off a cliff this year.
SET UP AND POCKET AWARENESS – 10 (76) 49
4
-quickness to release from under center into three-, five-, or seven-step drops with mobility and foot quickness with balance
NA
-chin on shoulder for backside awareness
0
-mobility in pocket to elude and avoid…hitch, hitch slide and throw
!
-feel pocket pressure
0
-strength in pocket
+
-does he know when to run/throw
+ (offense?)
-roll out left and right
++++
-square shoulders on the move
+++
-does he drift in the pocket?
NoFIELD VISION/DEFENSE AND COVERAGE RECOGNITION – 10
4
-pre snap defensive reads/ability to identify the Mike linebacker, low safety or corner from slot and change protection
NA
-blitz recognition
0
-ability to audible or change play at the line of scrimmage
NA
-finding primary and secondary receivers
++
-coverage recognition on the move.
++
-quick and accurate reads
++
-proper progression
+
-timing
! (Offensive?)ACCURACY AND TOUCH – 10
7
-throwing all types of passing variations, trajectory, and ability to spin ball while taking off some strength.
+++
-short: catchable balls thrown where defenders can’t make a play, squeeze into window, screen/swing passes
++
-intermediate/long: Stick it on receiver, deep-ball placement, squeeze over linebacker in front of safeties.
+++
-tight window throws
?DELIVERY AND RELEASE – 8
5
-type of release (over ear, sidearm, pitcher release on post leg, elongated motion)?
++
-upper-body passer lacks weight transfer?
No
-foot placement/balance
++
-release quickness
0
-follow through
++
-throw from different platforms?
?ARM STRENGTH – 8
7
-live arm?
Yes
-intermediate velocity/zip
+++
-long velocity/zip
++++
-tightness of spiral
+++
-wind up deep?
No
-balls lose interest?
NoLEADERSHIP AND POISE – 6
3
-commands respect, raises expectation while elevating the play of teammates?
++
-composure and the ability to perform in pressure situations
+
-not forcing balls into double or triple coverage
++
-ability and confidence to consistently deliver big plays under pressure
+
-smart decisions in time out management, milk clock before snapping ball
+
-4th quarter
+BALL HANDLING – 4
0
-hand size
-under center transfer
NA
-snap in shotgun
!
-selling play action
0
-smooth with eyes downfield
+
-where does the QB hold the ball
!RUNNING ABILITY- 4
3
-scrambling
++
-ability to run downhill with production
++
-big-play runner
+
-yards after contact
++++POTENTIAL – 10
9
-if utilized in ideal scenarioHEIGHT/WEIGHT – 6
6
-for a particular position7.5 +Top 5 pick
7.0 – 7.4 Top 25
6.5 – 6.9 Top 50
5.7 – 6.4 Top 100
5.4 – 5.6 Top 150
4.5 – 5.3 UDFA====
Jared Goff, Cal (6.3 Top 100)
Deadly accurate short with great placement, pace, and timing. Problem is, that’s basically all he throws. I assume his intermediate is solid because he does make accurate throws across much of the field (even if it’s only a 5-6 yard gain). Deep accuracy is a total guess. Bit stiff in the pocket but will move a bit with solid awareness. Will stand his ground when needed and deliver. Doesn’t drift in the pocket. All shotgun. Solid throwing motion and arm strength. Quick decision maker. Basically a lot of guesswork because of the offense but looks like he has the tools a team will be interested in developing.
SET UP AND POCKET AWARENESS – 10 (60) 36
5
-quickness to release from under center into three-, five-, or seven-step drops with mobility and foot quickness with balance.
NA
-chin on shoulder for backside awareness
++
-mobility in pocket to elude and avoid…hitch, hitch slide and throw
+
-feel pocket pressure
+
-strength in pocket
+++
-does he know when to run/throw
Yes
-roll out left and right
0
-square shoulders on the move
+
-does he drift in the pocket?
NoFIELD VISION/DEFENSE AND COVERAGE RECOGNITION – 10
6
-pre snap defensive reads/ability to identify the Mike linebacker, low safety or corner from slot and change protection
NA
-blitz recognition
0
-ability to audible or change play at the line of scrimmage
NA
-finding primary and secondary receivers
+++
-coverage recognition on the move.
++
-quick and accurate reads
+++
-proper progression
+
-timing
+++ACCURACY AND TOUCH – 10
6
-throwing all types of passing variations, trajectory, and ability to spin ball while taking off some strength.
++
-short: catchable balls thrown where defenders can’t make a play, squeeze into window, screen/swing passes
+++>
-intermediate/long: Stick it on receiver, deep-ball placement, squeeze over linebacker in front of safeties
?DELIVERY AND RELEASE – 8
6
-type of release (over ear, sidearm, pitcher release on post leg, elongated motion)?
++
-upper-body passer lacks weight transfer?
+
-foot placement/balance
++
-release quickness
+
-follow through
++
-throw from different platforms?
?ARM STRENGTH – 8
6
-live arm?
Yes
-intermediate velocity/zip
+
-long velocity/zip
?
-tightness of spiral
++
-wind up deep?
?
-balls lose interest?
?LEADERSHIP AND POISE – 6
4
-commands respect, raises expectation while elevating the play of teammates?
+
-composure and the ability to perform in pressure situations
+
-not forcing balls into double or triple coverage
++
-ability and confidence to consistently deliver big plays under pressure
?
-smart decisions in time out management, milk clock before snapping ball
+
-4th quarter
+BALL HANDLING – 4
2
-hand size
-under center transfer
NA
-selling play action
++
-smooth with eyes downfield
0
-where does the QB hold the ball
++RUNNING ABILITY- 4
1
-scrambling
0
-ability to run downhill with production
0
-big-play runner
!
-yards after contact
0POTENTIAL – 10
7
-if utilized in ideal scenarioHEIGHT/WEIGHT – 6
5
-for a particular position7.5 +Top 5 pick
7.0 – 7.4 Top 25
6.5 – 6.9 Top 50
5.7 – 6.4 Top 100
5.4 – 5.6 Top 150
4.5 – 5.3 UDFA————-
Dak Prescott, Miss State (5.5 Top 150)
Offense is a negative but in that offense Prescott shows very good pocket awareness and movement when allowed to get into a rhythm as a passer. Appears he also is allowed to scan the entire field on plays from the pocked at times and does a good job when allowed (not the typical one or two read max then run). Smooth release and extremely accurate short and intermediate when playing from the pocket. Accuracy drops off on the move, especially with WRs crossing his face. Upper and lower body mechanics are out of timing fairly often probably because of what the offense asks. Throws some “what the…” passes but also makes some great tight window throws. Good timing on back shoulder throws. Long ball isn’t a big part of the offense and Prescott looks like he just chucks it in a general area when they do. Missed some WIDE open WRs. Very good arm with plenty of zip. Some balls come out pushed instead of snapped. Very good with the ball and skilled at selling play action. Solid chain mover as a scrambler. Curious if he measures shorter after the season.
SET UP AND POCKET AWARENESS – 10 (76) 42
5
-quickness to release from under center into three-, five-, or seven-step drops with mobility and foot quickness with balance
NA
-chin on shoulder for backside awareness
-mobility in pocket to elude and avoid…hitch, hitch slide and throw
+++
-feel pocket pressure
++
-strength in pocket
+++
-does he know when to run/throw
++
-roll out left and right
+
-square shoulders on the move
+
-does he drift in the pocket?
NoFIELD VISION/DEFENSE AND COVERAGE RECOGNITION – 10
5
-pre snap defensive reads/ability to identify the Mike linebacker, low safety or corner from slot and change protection
0
-blitz recognition
0
-ability to audible or change play at the line of scrimmage
NA
-finding primary and secondary receivers
++
-coverage recognition on the move
0
-quick and accurate reads
+
-proper progression
+
-timing
+ACCURACY AND TOUCH – 10
5
-throwing all types of passing variations, trajectory, and ability to spin ball while taking off some strength.
+
-short: catchable balls thrown where defenders can’t make a play, squeeze into window, screen/swing passes
++
-intermediate/long: Stick it on receiver, deep-ball placement, squeeze over linebacker in front of safeties.
(Intermediate ++ Long !!)DELIVERY AND RELEASE – 8
5
-type of release (over ear, sidearm, pitcher release on post leg, elongated motion)?
+
-upper-body passer lacks weight transfer?
(Inconsistent)
-foot placement/balance
(Inconsistent)
-release quickness
+
-follow through
++
-throw from different platforms?
++ARM STRENGTH – 8
5
-live arm?
Yes
-intermediate velocity/zip
++
-long velocity/zip
++
-tightness of spiral
+
-wind up deep?
No
-balls lose interest?
(At time do to poor lower body timing)LEADERSHIP AND POISE – 6
4
-commands respect, raises expectation while elevating the play of teammates?
++
-composure and the ability to perform in pressure situations
+
-not forcing balls into double or triple coverage
!
-ability and confidence to consistently deliver big plays under pressure
++
-smart decisions in time out management, milk clock before snapping ball
+
-4th quarter
+BALL HANDLING – 4
2
-hand size
-under center transfer
NA
-snap in shotgun
+++
-selling play action
++
-smooth with eyes downfield
-where does the QB hold the ball
(Pocket ++ Run !)RUNNING ABILITY- 4
2
-scrambling
+
-ability to run downhill with production
+
-big-play runner
0
-yards after contact
++POTENTIAL – 10
-if utilized in ideal scenario
6HEIGHT/WEIGHT – 6
-for a particular position
37.5 +Top 5 pick
7.0 – 7.4 Top 25
6.5 – 6.9 Top 50
5.7 – 6.4 Top 100
5.4 – 5.6 Top 150
4.5 – 5.3 UDFANovember 14, 2015 at 12:11 am #34087AgamemnonParticipantHe didn’t even mention Kevin Hogan. He is a link to some videos of the QBs. http://draftbreakdown.com/video/?position=QB
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1851143/kevin-hogan
Kevin Hogan, QB
School: Stanford | Conference: PAC12
College Experience: Senior | Hometown: McLean, VA
Height/Weight: 6-4 / 218 lbs.Strengths Weaknesses
STRENGTHS: Hogan passes the eye test with a broad-shouldered, well-built frame for the position. Instincts, accuracy and velocity are enough to overcome the quirky delivery.Hogan has good (but not great) accuracy to all levels with especially impressive touch on deep passes when he has the room to step into his throw. While accuracy is a concern, arm strength is not. Hogan has a rifle.
Hogan has been well protected by the elite talent blocking in front of him but when pressure does force him off his spot, he is willing to step up in the pocket, exhibiting poise, toughness and quick decision-making to either throw or run. Hogan shows impressive accuracy when rolling to his right. Like Andrew Luck before him, Hogan is faster (and stronger) than he looks, making him a formidable threat on the run.
Stanford’s scheme calls for lots of play-action, boots and throwing on the move and deep shots – staples of a pro-style offense that suit Hogan’s athleticism and strong arm well.
WEAKNESSES: Elongated delivery. Struggles with accuracy on deep passes. Lacks great mobility that is increasingly valued in the NFL.
Hogan can hit the open man consistently but too often his passes force receivers to adjust their routes slightly, limiting run-after-the-catch opportunities and occasionally leaving pass-catchers vulnerable to big hits. Worse, Hogan will simply air-mail a pass now and then, missing his receiver by a few yards.
IN OUR VIEW: Stanford’s run-heavy offense doesn’t cater to gaudy statistics and Hogan has struggled with consistency, at times, but he possesses many of the traits scouts are looking for and promises to be among the most scrutinized quarterbacks in the country this fall.
Inconsistent or not, quarterbacks with Hogan’s combination of traits and experience in a pro-style offense typically don’t last long on draft day. If Hogan can put it all together in 2015, he could “surprise” and give Michigan State ‘s Connor Cook a run as the top senior quarterback prospect in the country.
COMPARES TO: Philip Rivers, Chargers – Elongated wind-up that will earn plenty of criticism in the pre-draft process but like Rivers, Hogan’s instincts, accuracy and velocity are enough to overcome the quirky delivery.
2016 doesn’t seem as strong as 2015 was for QBs. imo
November 14, 2015 at 8:51 am #34098InvaderRamModeratori’ve been reading about the kid from north carolina marquise williams. i don’t see him on many draft boards, but some think he’s got potential. he’s a 2 way quarterback but he’s supposed to have some passing skills.
November 17, 2015 at 8:27 am #34275AgamemnonParticipanthttp://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2016/QB
Who knows. 😉
We could draft Jones with Philly’s 2cd rounder. That would be fitting. imo
- This reply was modified 9 years ago by Agamemnon.
November 17, 2015 at 8:00 pm #34313InvaderRamModeratorwell. at least some of the top qbs will be coming into play? or will they be gone by the tenth pick?
November 18, 2015 at 12:29 am #34317AgamemnonParticipantwell. at least some of the top qbs will be coming into play? or will they be gone by the tenth pick?
Chance that one of the top 3 is there past ten and we take him? 10%
Chance that we take a QB in the 2cd round? 40%
Chance that we take a QB anywhere in the draft? 60%
I couldn’t get Miss Cleo on the phone, but I did get her cat.
WR MICHAEL THOMAS OHIO STATE
QB CARDALE JONES OHIO STATE
DE CARL NASSIB PENN STATE
TE NICK VANNETT OHIO STATE
WR BRAXTON MILLER OHIO STATE
QB KEVIN HOGAN STANFORD
My all Ohio St. draft.
November 18, 2015 at 1:55 pm #34361AgamemnonParticipantNovember 20, 2015 at 2:14 pm #34455znModeratorone opinion from off the net
—
jrry32
If the Rams stick with two QBs that are sitting on the bench currently, they’re fools. They better know Mannion is Dan freaking Marino if they’re doing that.
In order:
1a. Paxton Lynch
1b. Jared Goff
3. Connor Cook
4. Carson WentzBut if Wentz has a strong showing at the Senior Bowl, I’ll likely put him over Cook.(we’ll see still working on my evaluations of all four)
Do not want Hackenberg, Cardale, or Brissett. They’re all talented but far too risky and need too much development imo.
Cook is streaky. It’s an issue. And that’s why he doesn’t seem accurate. Because it’s not consistent enough. But I think he’ll be a good enough QB even with the streakiness to be worth a first round pick. If he cleans up his mechanics and becomes a more consistent QB, he’ll be very good.
People had a lot of these same concerns with Cam Newton. His footwork and game have matured and he’s become a more consistent passer. Will Cook do the same? Maybe. Maybe not. That’s the risk. But if you’re drafting a QB outside of the top 10, there are going to be more than minor flaws you have to deal with.
fter watching some of his games from this year, I’m bumping Connor Cook up to a first round grade.(had him as a 2nd rounder on my first QB rankings)
But I have to say…he’s the second most frustrating QB I’ve ever evaluated. The first is Matthew Stafford.
When I watch Cook, he’s very streaky. He has 5-10 plays where he looks like Aaron Rodgers and then another 5-10 plays where he looks like Nick Foles. The closest comparison I can think of is Eli Manning.(Jay Cutler is another possible comparison…but Cook doesn’t have the same level of arm strength)
Like Eli, he has some issues with lower body mechanics and makes too many derpy decisions. But also like Eli, you see a lot of flashes of greatness, serious competitiveness, underrated mobility, and a whole lot of toughness.
I think a couple of his issues with his lower body are that he has too narrow of a base when sitting in the pocket so he’s not stepping into his throws and incorporating his lower body like he should. He also throws off balance too often.(either of his back-foot or without his feet set)
One thing Daniel Jeremiah pointed out was his tendency to allow his front-shoulder to fly open…after he mentioned it, I noticed it happening a bit when he wasn’t setting his feet.
His decision making needs to improve. He’s too aggressive at times and makes derpy decisions…that’s the best way I can describe it. He refuses to give up on a play and does something inexplicable and extremely stupid. I think he might have an issue with his confidence. Seems to get mentally rattled at times when his performance is off…like he keeps digging the hole deeper and it takes him a little while to pull himself out of the funk.
On the other side of the coin, he murders the blitz. He’s special at reading the blitz, finding the match-up advantage, and getting the ball out on time. He’s patient in the pocket and willing to take hits but his internal clock and feel for pressure are both very good. Will move defenders with his eyes. And he has a good feel for the pocket.
His instincts in the pocket are very good. He feels pressure, moves within the pocket, remains calm, and finds a throwing lane. He’s deceptively athletic and strong which allows him to slip/avoid tackles and extend the play. He moves well in the pocket with a good feel for space. Doesn’t get rattled by a muddled or collapsing pocket.
And the most impressive part of his game to me is his ability to throw guys open. True anticipation passer that throws the ball to spots and allows his receivers to make a play. Timing is also excellent. He doesn’t hesitate to throw before a WR has made his break and put the ball right on the money. Stood out to me in how good he is at sticking the ball into tight windows even before his WR breaks. When his accuracy is on, to make a baseball analogy, he paints the corner of the strike zone. There’s hitting the strike zone and then there’s painting the corners. I like my QBs to hit the strike zone…but I drool when my QB paints the corner. When Cook’s accuracy is on, he puts the ball in the one spot where only his guy can get it. And he’s especially good at making touch throws against defenders that have their back turned in man coverage…he drops it in right over the top.
In terms of physical tools, he’s good but not elite. His arm strength is good and I think it’ll be considered very good once his lower body mechanics are ironed out a bit. Prototypical NFL frame at 6’3″/6’4″ 220. Could add a little weight but it’s not an issue. Solid mobility…I think it’s gotten better as he’s matured. I think he’s more coordinated and his feet are quicker than 2013 Connor Cook.
So yea, I’m giving him a first round grade. There are flaws in his game. There are issues to iron out. There are frustrating inconsistencies. But there are also a lot of really good things that translate well to the NFL game. As always, I think you should give him a year to develop…but he is capable of starting as a rookie. Just prepare yourself for streakiness and interceptions.
Hackenberg holds the ball too long, doesn’t feel pressure, and takes far too many sacks. When he does throw, his accuracy is seriously inconsistent. I totally understand that he has had poor talent around him. But it’s hard for me to ignore how bad he’s looked the past two years.
Could you hit it big with this kid? Yes. But he’s too risky for me to bet it all on. He’s the type of guy that a team like the Patriots, Cardinals, Saints, Chargers, etc. can bet it on. Because they have time to develop him and don’t lose a bunch of games if he doesn’t pan out.
November 20, 2015 at 2:43 pm #34459AgamemnonParticipantNovember 20, 2015 at 6:16 pm #34467InvaderRamModeratori like carson wentz. i think the wrs are good enough.
cook. you know i haven’t really seen either play so i am really just speaking off what i have read and stats. but cook’s accuracy looks really spotty. of course. the advantage with him is that he plays in a pro style offense.
November 21, 2015 at 10:37 pm #34508AgamemnonParticipantNovember 22, 2015 at 4:02 am #34517InvaderRamModeratorgood video. thanks for that.
November 26, 2015 at 3:18 pm #34738AgamemnonParticipant
SUDFELD, Nate | Indiana | #7-A big, deceptively athletic quarterback with a strong arm. Sudfeld is a player who will pick up steam as the draft process unfolds. He’s flying under the radar a little bit and if he can find himself in a post-season all star game, his big arm and good looking frame will make his stock bubble up.
WENTZ, Carson | North Dakota State | #11
-An impressive athlete who proved to be a dangerous dual threat in 2014 and was on his way for similar success this year before a wrist injury ended his season. Wentz has already been invited to the Senior Bowl; he’s the kind of player who can dictate where he ends up getting picked if he has a strong showing during the week of practices in Mobile. He only has about 1.5 years of starter’s tape, so scouts will naturally be hesitant to give him a higher than day-three grade. He’s displayed plenty of arm strength and accuracy between last year and the start of ’15, but he’s an incomplete evaluation for me until the all star circuit gets going. I rarely let those events overwhelm my final grade, but in the case of Wentz, it will be critically important for him.
Another QB to look at. Just copied this from a previous post in this thread.
December 2, 2015 at 6:49 am #35007znModeratorRams could hop aboard QB carousel in ’16
Jim Thomas
In a few months this may be Los Angeles’ problem. But as the 2015 Rams season winds down — or should we say, unravels — it’s looking more and more like quarterback will be a top offseason priority.
Beginning with Sunday’s game against Arizona, that gives Nick Foles and Case Keenum five games to make an impression.
The person with the most to gain seemingly would be Keenum, whose contract expires after this season. It’s obvious that coach Jeff Fisher likes Keenum, or why trade for him last March — and as things turned out, basically hand him the No. 2 job over Austin Davis right then and there?
Fisher made it clear two weeks ago when benching Foles after the Chicago game that Keenum would not have a short leash. In re-iterating Monday that a healthy Keenum would be his starter this week against Arizona, it’s clear that Fisher wants to get more of a look.
“He’s really disappointed that he didn’t get to play last week,” Fisher said. “I don’t buy into the philosophy where someone’s going to lose their job because they got hurt.
“Unfortunately, Case had the set of circumstances at the end of the Baltimore game that prevented him from playing last week. Hopefully, he’s going to be back this week and he’ll play. I’m going to give Case a fair shot.”
After a players’ day off Tuesday, Fisher expects Keenum to be back on the practice field in some capacity Wednesday as he attempts to clear the NFL concussion protocol.
And what of Foles? He had a chance against Cincinnati to remind everyone why the Rams traded for him last March, starting in place of the concussed Keenum. Instead, he threw three interceptions, one of which was returned for a touchdown and another that killed a potential Rams scoring drive.
In matter-of-fact fashion, Fisher broke down the three INTs, mistakes you just can’t have under any circumstances, much less with an offense struggling mightily to score points.
“First (interception) was a little late,” Fisher said. “Reggie (Nelson) did a great job … read his eyes and just took off and pushed, and the ball was deflected.”
The Rams had a first down at the Cincinnati 23 with 44 seconds left in the first half when Foles threw that interception to Nelson on a ball tipped by fellow Bengals safety George Iloka. The pass was intended for tight end Jared Cook over the middle.
Foles’ second interception, made by veteran cornerback Leon Hall, was returned 19 yards for a victory-sealing touchdown with 5½ minutes to play in the third quarter. The ball was intended for Bradley Marquez, but as Fisher said, never should have been thrown.
“He was trying to make a play,” Fisher said. “He was scrambling around. He should not have thrown that ball. Throw the ball in the ground. Get what you can, get down, and punt the ball away.”
With the game’s outcome well-decided, Foles’ third interception took place in Cincinnati territory early in the fourth quarter on a play in which wide receiver Kenny Britt got open on a double-move.
“(Foles) was a little bit late,” Fisher said. “It sailed inside, and the safety made a great play on the ball.”
That gave Foles nine interceptions on the season, compared with only seven touchdowns.
“He’s a confident player,” Fisher insisted. “He’s confident. Those things are not unsettling to him. He comes back.”
But if Keenum returns and plays well, Foles might not see the field again this season. If that’s the case, the Rams must decide if Foles is salvageable for 2016. If the team decides to part ways with him, it would be costly.
A $6 million roster bonus payable on the third day of the 2016 league year (in March) became guaranteed when Foles was on the roster this past Aug. 15. In addition, there is $2 million of unamortized signing bonus money that would count against the 2016 cap if Foles were released. Counter-balancing that would be a relatively modest $1.75 million in base salary saved if he were released.
Last but not least is rookie Sean Mannion, the third-round draft pick out of Oregon State. He is just starting out on what was a four-year, $3.25 million contract coming out of college. So he’s going nowhere.
Based on the subpar play of Foles and Keenum so far, the outcry has risen among Rams fans and many media observers to play Mannion. Fisher tried to explain Monday why that’s probably not the best idea at this point.
“He’s been in the meetings with the quarterbacks every day since the draft,” Fisher said. “He got reps during camp. He got to play in preseason games. (But) once you get in the regular season your (No.) 1 and (No.) 2’s are getting the reps. It’s hard to get your (No.) 3 reps.”
The starting quarterback gets almost all of the practice repetitions with the first-team offense. The top backup gets most of the reps running the scout team offense against the Rams’ first-team defense. That leaves only a few crumbs for the third-stringer.
Long story short, Mannion isn’t ready to make a legitimate run at the starting job — at least not yet. But the Rams wouldn’t have drafted him in the third round if they didn’t think he had starter’s potential.
“That’s correct, yeah,” Fisher said. “Not many teams have drafted a quarterback in the third round and started him as rookie, either. It takes time.”
If the Rams chose not to re-sign Keenum and decided to bite the salary cap bullet on Foles, Mannion could be competing against some fresh faces in training camp.
In the draft, Michigan State’s Connor Cook, Memphis’ Paxton Lynch and California’s Jared Goff probably are the top three quarterback prospects at this point. That’s assuming Lynch and Goff, both juniors, turn pro.
As for free agency? Well, there’s this guy named Bradford whose contract is scheduled to expire after this season in Philadelphia.
December 2, 2015 at 6:53 am #35008znModeratorfrom off the net
—
Flipper336
The qbs, 2016
Guys will get pushed up/hyped because of the position. I see no top 10 types and probably no top 25 types either. My early view though (VERY loose order)….
I still like Hackenburg. I have seen EVERY other top QB in this draft struggle just as bad or worse when dealing with even close to the pressure/defensive stress he sees on a consistent basis…and all have better help on the offensive side. Lightning quick release, makes every throw with ease, keeps eyes downfield, has no conscience or quit even after two years of beatings. Makes some inaccurate passes that make me slap my forehead wondering what happened though.
Carson Wentz – overall mechanics need to be tightened up. Accurate, doesn’t panic with pressure, can make plays on the run with his legs or arm. The competition issue doesn’t bother me.
Paxton Lynch – Big, mobile, cannon arm, throws with nice accuracy to all levels.
Connor Cook – Really solid prospect. Sets up quickly, gets through his progressions, extremely fast release. Inconsistent accuracy but can be pinpoint. Really good example of “what if ” with Hackenburg. Very similar prospects but I think Hack is even better at Michigan State and wonder if Cook isn’t a late round guy at Penn State.
Goff – Similar prospect to Bradford but he’s at least faced some pressure and made some tight window throws.
Jacob Coker – Was neck and neck for the Florida St. job when J.Winston finally won it at the wire. Big with good feet, strong arm, accurate, keeps his offense on schedule.
Kevin Hogan – Hate his delivery but makes quick, smart decisions and throws with good timing and accuracy.
==========
from off the net
—
Deadpool
Its really early.
As far as the top 6 today:
1. Connor Cook
2a. Paxton Lynch
2b. Jared Goff
4. Christian Hackenberg
5. Carson Wentz
6. Kevin HoganThis is the 3rd year I have been hyping Cook and Hogan, so maybe I have my blinders firmly in place. And living in ND and Wentz going to NDSU is maybe a little homerish.
As far as highest ceiling:
Lynch and Hackenberg. Lynch has not played ultra tough competition, nor does he have NFL quality around him. Hackenberg was the top QB coming out of HS and looked good his frosh year, then he had no one around him and he has looked not good. But his talent is still there.
1 or both may go back to college. Hackenberg more likely to go back then Lynch.
Most mobile:
as far as those 6, its Hogan, then Lynch.
Best arm: Hackenberg
Highest Floor: Cook, pro style offense, a senior and top level competition.
I think Lynch goes first (not overall, just as far as QBs go), then Goff, then Cook and then the rest in the 2nd-3rd rounds.
I don’t like comparisons, but I will do it here:
Lynch – Rothlisberger. Both big kids. Lynch is 6′-7″ 240. Both are a lot more athletic then you would think, both came from smaller FBS colleges. The one thing about Lynch is that he has not played against 1 draftable CB all year.
Goff – Matt Ryan other then different systems. An accurate, pocket passer. I have seen him make a read (at least it looked like it in slow mo playback) he will stand in the pocket and take a hit. He just seemed like he was pushing too hard in the middle of the season, and he kinda had to because he had no one around him. But he made some bad decisions. He can move around in the pocket.
Connor Cook – Carson Palmer (not quite the arm) Chad Pennington maybe. High floor, lower ceiling. Mobile, tough, came from a pro style offense in a tough conference. Accuracy is his bugaboo, but this year its better. Not afraid to make the tough throw. Nothing that WOWs you, but he wins.
Christian Hackenberg – A poor man’s Andrew Luck maybe Phillip Rivers or a less jerky Cutler? So much arm talent, can move in the pocket, but has issues with throwing the underneath stuff and his mechanics are a mess right now. 1 year behind another QB with a good QB coach would do him wonders.
Carson Wentz – Another Big Ben comp. – Can make all the throws, can and will scramble and lowers his shoulder to finish off a run. A leader withprototypical size. His issue is level of competition. FBS. He is out until the senior bowl with a small bone fracture in his throwing wrist. He played the whole USD game with it. He’s tough.
Kevin Hogan – compares to Phillip Rivers in every way. Funky elongated delivery that makes me want to kick bunnies. Plenty of arm strength, accurate and can scramble more then Rivers ever could. And a pro style offense.
December 3, 2015 at 4:47 pm #35067znModeratorScout: I’d hate to be team in need of QB in 2016 NFL Draft
By Daniel Jeremiah and Lance Zierlein
he scoop: “I’d hate to be a team in need of a quarterback. The best two in this draft might end up being from Memphis and North Dakota State and that ought to scare the (expletive) out of you. It takes some courage to turn that card in.” — NFC scout
The skinny: Any time a general manager takes a quarterback early in the first round, he’s putting his job on the line, no matter where the player comes from. It might be a lot easier to pull the trigger on a QB from a marquee program who has played on a big stage before, but certainly this scout knows that there are plenty of examples of QBs from top programs that were picked early and went bust (JaMarcus Russell, anyone?). We’ve seen QBs from small schools come off the board early and go on to great success (Ben Roethlisberger, Phil Simms, Terry Bradshaw).
As for the two QBs he’s referring to, North Dakota State’s Carson Wentz will get a chance to prove himself against tougher competition at the Reese’s Senior Bowl in January. Memphis’ Paxton Lynch is a junior and has not revealed his intentions for the 2016 NFL Draft. As an underclassman, he has until a Jan. 18 deadline to make a decision on early draft entry. Both QBs are impressive talents. Our colleague Gil Brandt sees plenty to like in Wentz’s game, and we saw the qualities of a top QB prospect when we took an up-close look at Lynch last month.
December 6, 2015 at 9:57 pm #35196AgamemnonParticipantalyoshamucci
I would have Hackenburg as my 4th. I understand that people have soured due to his numbers, but I can counter that pretty easily having watched him since his first game.
He committed and went to PSU for O Brien to be tutored by a pro QB coach .. who then abandoned him to the ultra conservative running coach Franklin … that’s when A Robinson bolted for the NFL too. J James bolted too. He won’t stay in school, he’s got Elway level talent and a coach that doesn’t care about QBs.
His issues, his mechanics issues, are on short throws and all based on footwork. It’s an easy fix for any coach that works with QBs at all, which Franklin doesn’t.
The only thing I don’t know about is his attitude. I have no idea how cohesive the team is, or how his coach lets him lead, but that would be my only question about him, and I’d have him no lower than 15. He has the mentality of a starting NFL QB, and the lower he gets drafted, the bigger the chip on his shoulder is going to be.
Of course he could be a jerk, too. Dunno.
I think Lynch and Wentz need a year, and Hackenburg likely too at least a half year.
I have no idea what happens to Foles … odds are it depends on the coaching situation.
But I have
Goff
Cook
Hackenburg
Lynch
Wentzthen Sudfeld a strong 6th.
Goff and Cook will come out ready to play football. Goff has the best pocket presence besides maybe Luck Ive seen in college. Cook is a gamer. Both are pro offense in tough divisions.
Another poster’s take on the QBs.
I like Cook. It is fine if they pick someone else.
I have Mannion, so I am OK no matter what. 😉
December 6, 2015 at 10:19 pm #35202InvaderRamModeratorhackenberg’s stats are horrible. i don’t care what kind of offense he was in or what kind of coaching he had. but a passing percentage of 53% in college screams project to me.
rams have no need for that. not even sure they would be equipped to even coach him up if that were possible.
i bet he’ll light up the combine. and someone will gamble on him. but i’d say big mistake.
December 7, 2015 at 1:13 pm #35242znModeratorI have Mannion, so I am OK no matter what.
You know what’s kind of interesting about Mannion? He has that odd throwing motion yet he gets the ball out quick.
.
December 15, 2015 at 1:47 pm #35667ZooeyModeratorCBS has a mock draft with the Rams drafting a QB with a mustache. I forgot his name already, but I’m sure he would be great.
December 15, 2015 at 6:47 pm #35686wvParticipant——————————————–
NFLDraftScout.com
2016 NFL Mock Draft: North Dakota State QB belongs in first-round mix
By Dane Brugler | NFLDraftScout.com Senior Analyst
December 13, 2015 11:13 pm ETThere is no such thing as a “sure thing” when it comes to evaluating the quarterback position and that is especially true for the 2016 draft class. There isn’t an Andrew Luck or even a Jameis Winston or Marcus Mariota, but there are several high-upside passers who deserve first round consideration.
Cal’s Jared Goff and Memphis’ Paxton Lynch are the top two names and both have a great chance of landing in the top 10. Michigan State’s Connor Cook is widely believed to be this year’s top senior at the position, but North Dakota State’s Carson Wentz will be higher on some team’s draft boards and also has a chance to wind up in next spring’s first round.
Of those four quarterbacks, only Cook is ready to start as a NFL rookie, but Goff, Lynch and Wentz all have bright futures if given the chance to develop.
Team needs will change, the draft order won’t end up this way and the prospects below will help and hurt themselves throughout the 2015 season. But if the draft was held tomorrow, here’s how it might play out:
1. Tennessee Titans: Laremy Tunsil, OT, Ole Miss
Priority number one for the Titans should be to protect Marcus Mariota, something they have struggled to do consistently in 2015. Tunsil is arguably the most talented player in this year’s draft class and able to contribute from day one, pushing Taylor Lewan over to right tackle.2. Cleveland Browns: Joey Bosa, DE, Ohio State
There is a lot of unknown with the future of the Browns franchise right now, including what the depth chart at quarterback will look like next season. If Johnny Manziel can do enough to keep Cleveland from drafting a quarterback in the top-five, Bosa will just need to hop on I-71 North.3. San Diego Chargers: Jalen Ramsey, DB, Florida State
Is Ramsey a cornerback or safety? Both. And the Chargers need help at both spots, contributing in press or zone, inside or outside.4. Baltimore Ravens: Ronnie Stanley, OT, Notre Dame
Baltimore inked Eugene Monroe to a lucrative extension, but he hasn’t been able to stay healthy, making it tough for the Ravens to rely on him to start 16 games in 2016. Stanley not only adds instant depth, but gives Baltimore a long-term plan at a position of need.5. Dallas Cowboys: Myles Jack, LB, UCLA
The Cowboys’ defense needs help at each level, including at linebacker, especially with the futures of Rolando McClain (free agent) and Sean Lee (injuries) in doubt. Although currently sidelined with a knee injury, Jack has top-10 talent if his rehab is on track.Myles Jack would provide immediate impact in Big D. (USATSI)
6. San Francisco 49ers: Jared Goff, QB, California
The 49ers and Colin Kaepernick are in the midst of a messy divorce and Blaine Gabbert hasn’t done enough to convince the front office that he’s the long-term answer. San Francisco native, Goff lacks elite physical tools, but his traits, especially between the ears, are extremely promising.7. Detroit Lions: Taylor Decker, OT, Ohio State
With a new front office, the Lions will be a wildcard in the first round, especially if Detroit makes a splash with one of the high-priced contracts (Matthew Stafford, Calvin Johnson, etc.) on the current roster. Decker is a plug-and-play option on the offensive line, which would address the Lions’ issues at right tackle.8. Jacksonville Jaguars: Vernon Hargreaves, CB, Florida
The Jaguars have been searching for cornerback help for a long time, but haven’t drafted the position in the first round since 1999. Hargreaves isn’t a lock top-10 prospect due to average size and speed, but his toughness and instincts make him a fit for Jacksonville.9. Chicago Bears: Jaylon Smith, LB, Notre Dame
The Bears are far removed from the days of Brian Urlacher and Lance Briggs dominating the NFC and are missing impact players like that on the 2015 defense. Smith isn’t the physical presence that Urlacher or Briggs were, but he brings a special combination of athleticism and instincts.10. St. Louis Rams: Paxton Lynch, QB, Memphis
The Nick Foles experiment hasn’t worked and the Rams need new life at quarterback. Lynch is still a work-in-progress at the position, but he checks a lot of boxes and would give the franchise hope, whether that’s in St. Louis or Los Angeles.Paxton Lynch could be the future for the Rams at QB. (USATSI)
11. New Orleans Saints: Laquon Treadwell, WR, Mississippi
Regardless of who is at quarterback, the Saints need to find the “new” Marques Colston – a large target with athleticism. That description fits Treadwell who is a less dynamic version of Dez Bryant.12. New York Giants: Emmanuel Ogbah, DE, Oklahoma State
The Giants rank near dead-last in the league in team sacks and aren’t receiving the production they need from their edge rushers. Ogbah is among the NCAA leaders in sacks (13) and has the character and talent that fits the Giants’ franchise.13. Miami Dolphins: Reggie Ragland, LB, Alabama
Miami has missed that physical presence at middle linebacker, making Ragland a natural fit and day one starter as a rookie.14. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Mackensie Alexander, CB, Clemson
Tampa will address the cornerback position next off-season, either in free agency or the draft, possibly both. Alexander has the fluidity and aggressive nature to blanket receivers.15. Atlanta Falcons: Robert Nkemdiche, DT, Ole Miss
The Falcons ranks dead-last in the league in sacks and need more talent both inside and outside on the defensive line. Although he’s still raw in areas, Nkemdiche has a sky-high ceiling as both an inside penetrator and outside rusher.16. Philadelphia Eagles: Leonard Floyd, DE/OLB, Georgia
The Eagles have several holes on defense and need to add depth at each level. Floyd has a lean body type, but can bend the edge, disrupt the pocket and finish in pursuit.December 15, 2015 at 7:55 pm #35688InvaderRamModeratori’ve read that this isn’t the best year to draft a qb.
but there’s still some talent there. do you go with potential in lynch or the pro ready guy in cook?
sadly last year would have been the perfect time to draft mariota.
December 16, 2015 at 4:48 am #35702AgamemnonParticipantI think it is a good year to draft a QB, maybe two. Because, there aren’t any Donalds or Gurleys or Coopers or any prototype position players. There are a lot of good players and I think any position is draftable. It is hard to do a draft and not come up with 5 good players. imo So, let’s get some QB talent and see if one of them is the guy we are looking for. There are enough out there that if figures that a couple will be good. imo
December 16, 2015 at 9:15 am #35703PA RamParticipantI guess my question would be: Is one of these “potential” guys any better than Mannion?
I would still love the Rams to grab a wide receiver. I’m not sure what they’re going to do with the line. They’re in pretty good shape at running back. 🙂
I haven’t followed the college game at all this year so I have no idea about these guys.
I have heard that some teams are wary of Cook because of his attitude? A little cocky maybe?
I’ll have to trust the Rams this year. I can’t help them.
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
December 16, 2015 at 10:36 am #35710znModeratorI’m not sure what they’re going to do with the line
I think next year it will become apparent they have an embarassment of riches on the OL.
If you count IR and the practice squad, they already have 14 linemen going into next year.
And as of this week, many of them are trending up. According to PFF, the following players had their best games of the year against the Lions: Robinson, Reynolds, Barnes. Havenstein actually had ONE OF his best games.
.
December 16, 2015 at 1:27 pm #35714AgamemnonParticipantI guess my question would be: Is one of these “potential” guys any better than Mannion?
I would still love the Rams to grab a wide receiver. I’m not sure what they’re going to do with the line. They’re in pretty good shape at running back.
I haven’t followed the college game at all this year so I have no idea about these guys.
I have heard that some teams are wary of Cook because of his attitude? A little cocky maybe?
I’ll have to trust the Rams this year. I can’t help them.
I like Mannion as much as anybody. Drafting another QB gives us another option instead of putting everything on Mannion. I believe we will draft a WR or two and a TE. The draft just is made that way this year. The OL is fine without the injuries. TBay’s OL is an example of that. They are the Rams but less injured. imo
Tbay starts two rookie OL and a off the street center.December 22, 2015 at 8:51 am #35903DakParticipantI’m not impressed with this QB bunch. Take one in the mid-rounds, like Mannion last year, or trade for a vet if possible.
December 22, 2015 at 11:53 am #35931znModeratorBump placeholder it’s technical
December 27, 2015 at 6:28 am #36101znModeratorWalterFootball.com
St. Louis Rams: Connor Cook, QB, Michigan State
The Rams almost have to pick a quarterback, don’t they? They paid Nick Foles this past offseason, but he’s a lost cause. Jeff Fisher is fed up with him, and I have to believe that this organization will desperately be searching for a new face of the franchise – especially if it makes the move out west to Los Angeles.
Connor Cook has some accuracy and consistency issues that NFL teams are legitimately worried about, but once again, teams will reach for quarterbacks, so he should end up being a top-15 selection. Cook also has some character concerns, but the Rams have shown that they don’t care about those.
Read more at http://walterfootball.com/draft2016_1.php#Dt6wBwIvf2qe1UoL.99
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.