Scientists in shock over election results

Just because Trump doesn’t believe in “climate change” doesn’t mean he’s “anti-science”.

Billy_T wrote:

bnw wrote:

Just because Trump doesn’t believe in “climate change” doesn’t mean he’s “anti-science”.

Um, yes it does. It’s settled science. There is no debate in the scientific community about its existence. The only debate is how best to respond to human-made destruction of the planet’s ecosystems. It’s all about “how?” at this point. And, of course, Trump never deals with “how?” when it comes to anything.

It isn’t “settled science”! It is a theory. A theory that real data doesn’t support.

No it isn’t. Far from it. When your models do not work don’t claim success. When your models don’t work with cherry picked data then you should expect your funding to dry up. Which it will when Trump is president.

nittany ram wrote:

bnw wrote:

No it isn’t. Far from it. When your models do not work don’t claim success. When your models don’t work with cherry picked data then you should expect your funding to dry up. Which it will when Trump is president.

bnw, I’ll give you this. Unlike Trump, I truly think you don’t believe in climate change. I don’t think Trump really believes climate change is a hoax. He just doesn’t care that it’s happening. He is more concerned with profits than averting environmental disaster. That’s why he will declaw the EPA and defund all clean energy research. You, unlike Trump, at least have integrity. You believe what you are saying. You are dead wrong, but at least you are a man of conviction. Trump has no conviction. His only concern is his bottom line. He’s really not worthy of your admiration.

I hope you get a chance to read the thread I posted about -Climate Change- Learning to think like a geologist. I was amazed while reading it and it is my perspective laid out beautifully by the author.