Net Neutrality Wins

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House Net Neutrality Wins

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #19111
    Zooey
    Participant

    Dana Liebelson
    dana.liebelson@huffingtonpost.com

    Net Neutrality Prevails In Historic FCC Vote
    Posted: 02/26/2015 1:02 pm EST Updated: 23 minutes ago

    WASHINGTON — The Federal Communications Commission voted Thursday to approve strong net neutrality rules in a stunning decision that defies vocal, months-long opposition by telecom and cable companies and Republicans on Capitol Hill.

    Democratic Commissioners Jessica Rosenworcel and Mignon Clyburn joined Chairman Tom Wheeler to approve a rule that reclassifies consumer broadband as a utility under Title II of the Communications Act.

    The FCC intends to use this new authority to ban “paid prioritization,” a practice whereby Internet service providers can charge content producers a premium for giving users more reliable access to that content. The FCC also intends to ban blocking and throttling of lawful content and services. These regulations also apply to mobile access.

    According to a fact sheet released by the FCC, the agency plans to enforce its new open Internet rules through “investigation and processing of formal and informal complaints.” For the first time, the FCC can also address complaints at interconnection points, the gateway between ISPs and the rest of the Internet, on a case-by-case basis.

    “The Internet is simply too important to allow broadband providers to be the ones making the rules,” Wheeler said prior to the vote.

    At the vote, Clyburn pointed out that “absent the rules we adopt today,” ISPs would be “free to block, throttle, favor or discriminate … for any user, for any reason, or for no reason at all.”

    A few months ago, such rules were considered a pipe dream of net neutrality advocates. Last fall, Wheeler was reportedly still considering a “hybrid” approach to net neutrality that would have made major concessions to telecom and cable companies, who contend that strong regulations will hinder investment and innovation.

    But President Barack Obama came out in support of Title II and tough net neutrality rules in November, and Wheeler had to contend with that position as well as millions of comments from the general public in support of net neutrality. Tech start-ups like Tumblr, as well as Silicon Valley giants like Google, also advocated for strong net neutrality rules.

    The FCC decision is a major loss for Verizon, the company that initially sued the FCC in 2011 over rules that were considerably weaker than the new regulations. The new rules are also likely to be challenged in court.

    “The FCC has taken us in a distressing direction. We must now look to other branches of government for a more balanced resolution,” said Michael Powell, president and CEO of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, a trade group.

    The FCC’s two Republican commissioners attacked the vote. Commissioner Ajit Pai called the decision an “about-face” and stoked conservative fears by claiming, “We are flip-flopping for one reason and one reason only: President Obama told us to do so.”

    Those gathered in one FCC viewing room gasped and burst into laughter upon hearing Pai’s remark.

    Republicans have launched investigations into whether the White House unfairly influenced the FCC’s decision, and are expected to pursue legislation, already introduced, that would gut the FCC’s new authority. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) has said he plans to hold off-the-record meetings with stakeholders in early March in an attempt to drum up support from Democrats for his bill.

    Republican members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology indicated they are not giving up on the fight. “We were — and we remain — willing to come to the table with legislation to answer the calls for legally sustainable consumer protections for the free and open Internet that has fostered a generation of innovation, economic growth, and global empowerment,” they said in a statement.

    From the other side, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) called the decision “a landmark day in the history of the Internet” and “a tremendous victory for freedom of ideas, of information, and of expression” in a statement.

    “Popular victories like today’s are so unusual that three Congressional committees are investigating how this happened,” said David Segal, executive director of Demand Progress, a group that supports net neutrality. He added in a statement, “If the net neutrality effort had followed the usual playbook, if Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T had defeated the American people, nobody would be wondering why.”

    Wheeler denounced as “nonsense” the claims that the FCC has a secret plan to regulate the Internet. He added, “This is no more a plan to regulate the Internet than the First Amendment is a plan to regulate free speech. They both stand for the same concept.”

    This article has been updated with additional information from the FCC and responses from Congress members.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/26/net-neutrality-fcc-vote_n_6761702.html?ir=Politics&utm_campaign=022615&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Alert-politics&utm_content=FullStory&ncid=newsltushpmg00000003

    #19144
    wv
    Participant
    #19169
    zn
    Moderator

    http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-02-26/how-john-oliver-transformed-the-net-neutrality-debate-once-and-for-all

    How John Oliver Transformed the Net Neutrality Debate Once and for All

    It started with a case of coyote urine.

    Before June 1, 2014, just four episodes of Last Week Tonight With John Oliver had aired. The weekly, half-hour HBO show took on current affairs from comedic angle. Conceptually in debt to Oliver’s alma mater, The Daily Show, Last Week Tonight nonetheless aimed for deeper dives on abstruse subjects, hardly a tried-and-true recipe for TV success. But as the fifth show began at 11 pm that Sunday, the British comedian introduced his latest explainer, joking that the Internet had vastly increased access to everything from cat pictures to “a case of coyote urine.”

    What followed was an acclaimed segment on net neutrality, that not only created significant buzz for his show but gave a bump to a political movement that will score its biggest victory to date on Thursday when the Federal Communications Commission is expected to buck cable companies, the GOP, and its own previous stance, to ensure protections for Oliver’s beloved open-access Internet for millions of Americans.

    “Turn on caps lock, and fly, my pretties!”
    John Oliver

    During his 13-minute segment, Oliver name-checked Netflix, Google, Usain Bolt, Superman, the game Monopoly, and Mein Kampf, and compared the FCC hiring former cable company lobbyists to “needing a babysitter and hiring a dingo.”

    “Our government looks set to end net neutrality,” Oliver warned, but there was a way to save it: The FCC was taking comments on rules. “Seize your moment, my lovely trolls,” Oliver implored at the segment’s climax as music swelled. “Turn on caps lock, and fly, my pretties!”

    And it worked. “By Monday, the FCC’s commenting system had stopped working, thanks to more than 45,000 new comments on net neutrality likely sparked by Oliver,” the Washington Post’s Soraya Nadia McDonald reported on June 4. Oliver “may be just the firebrand activist we’re looking for.”

    Net neutrality can be a mind-numbing concept. Oliver called it “even boring by C-SPAN standards.” At heart, it’s the policy that Internet providers (like a cable company) can’t charge content providers (like Netflix) to speed up delivery of their goods. Net neutrality advocates, like President Obama and now FCC Chair Tom Wheeler, say it’s what makes the Internet the relatively democratic place it is. Opponents like Senators Ted Cruz and John Thune say it will eliminate rewards for successful innovation.

    Oliver wrangled a whole lot of advocates on June 1.

    The Verge printed emails supposedly from actual FCC officials calling the segment “classic” and “Priceless!!!!!!” and saying, “We had a good laugh about it. The cable companies… not so much.”

    In November, just days after Obama endorsed net neutrality, the late New York Times media critic David Carr quoted a Twitter policy spokesman as saying that “a meeting of lobbyists and policy types… thought Mr. Oliver’s piece trumped many other efforts.”

    “We all agreed that John Oliver’s brilliant net neutrality segment explained a very complex policy issue in a simple, compelling way that had a wider reach than many expensive advocacy campaigns,” the spokesman, Nu Wexler, said.

    Today, a video of the segment that was posted to the show’s YouTube account has received more than 8 million views.

    Oliver gave us a great moment to rally around, and a hilarious video to share,” Tim Karr, senior director of strategy for Free Press, an advocacy group that has been fighting for net neutrality for more than a decade, wrote in an email to Bloomberg on Wednesday.

    To be sure, the fight was far bigger than Oliver’s segment. Karr pointed to “dozens of advocacy organizations with email lists that numbered in the tens of millions.” Politico called the fight “a lobbying bonanza” on par with health care reform. Nor are the gains sure to hold, as Republicans have vowed to come up with an alternative to the rules.

    John Oliver hasn’t said much about the segment’s impact, but the FCC’s Wheeler did.

    “I think that it represents the high level of interest that exists in the topic in the country, and that’s good,” he said, choosing his words carefully at a hearing on June 13 when asked what he thought of the segment. “You know… I would like to state for the record that I’m not a dingo.”

    #19246
    Zooey
    Participant

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/27/1367408/-Between-the-llamas-and-the-dress-you-may-have-missed-Fox-News-reaction-to-Net-Neutrality-decision?detail=email

    Between the llamas and the dress, you may have missed Fox News’ reaction to Net Neutrality decision
    byJen HaydenFollow

    February 26, 2015 was quite a day for the denizens of the internet world. First, the epic decision by the FCC to keep the internet open and free, followed by the great Arizona llama escape and finally the incredible dress debate.

    In all the excitement, you probably missed the Fox News coverage of the Net Neutrality decision.

    It’s the end of the internet as we know it!

    “Broad regulation of how Americans use the internet.” Curious choice of language given that Net Neutrality is about maintaining an open internet.
    Net Neutrality is the Internet’s guiding principle: It preserves our right to communicate freely online. This is the definition of an open Internet.

    Net Neutrality means an Internet that enables and protects free speech. It means that Internet service providers should provide us with open networks — and should not block or discriminate against any applications or content that ride over those networks. Just as your phone company shouldn’t decide who you can call and what you say on that call, your ISP shouldn’t be concerned with the content you view or post online.

    Without Net Neutrality, cable and phone companies could carve the Internet into fast and slow lanes. An ISP could slow down its competitors’ content or block political opinions it disagreed with. ISPs could charge extra fees to the few content companies that could afford to pay for preferential treatment — relegating everyone else to a slower tier of service. This would destroy the open Internet.

    So, how did Fox News fans react to the decision to keep the internet open and free? With unbridled outrage. Of course. I’m not including any names, only the comments, but below are a sample of the most uprated comments from the Fox News Facebook page:

    Hey 51% of you morons voted for him twice. You get what you get. And for those of you who stayed home and didn’t vote for Mitt….up yours !

    There goes Internet freedom. First thing will be no Fox News web site.

    So I guess our first amendment rights don’t matter.

    There goes the Internet as we know it.

    Are we living in North Korea??? Wait.. we must not… they at least control their borders.

    The Fall of Rome

    Obama is trash

    I didn’t realize that something needed to be “fixed”. Leave it to the government to step in a fix something that didn’t need to be fixed.

    Take freedom one bite at a time and the country watches in silence.

    Next he is after the bullets. How is it that we are putting up with this? I don’t care what this guy’s religion is or where he was born, it is too late to care about that, but I truly care that he is single handedly destroying the Constitution of the United States and for that he should be removed from office.

    Venezuela did the same thing as they tightened down on their communist regime. Then when the GNB was arresting, raping, and killing student protesters, they blocked the Internet and social media accounts of dissidents who where uploading all the proof to Twitter and Facebook… And this was all last year, by the way.

    The FCC just voted for government to sensor all content distributed onto the web. Prepare to be brainwashed with Liberal propaganda, and the word Freedom stripped from our vocabulary.

    Thanks again to the uneducated voters who have laid out my children’s and Grand Children’s futures. Much appreciated.

    Let that last one sink in a bit. Sadly, this is what we are up against as a country.

    #19251
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Let that last one sink in a bit. Sadly, this is what we are up against as a country.

    Jim Inhofe brought a snowball onto the Senate floor as proof against global warming.

    idiot

    I think maybe it would be better (safer?) for the rest of the world if we weren’t a country anymore.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 1 month ago by nittany ram.
    #19264
    Zooey
    Participant

    Let that last one sink in a bit. Sadly, this is what we are up against as a country.

    Jim Inhofe brought a snowball onto the Senate floor as proof against global warming.

    idiot

    I think maybe it would be better (safer?) for the rest of the world if we weren’t a country anymore.

    There should be a Mercy Rule.

    Once a nation’s Total Stupidity Index reaches a certain level, it’s just time….

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.