The focus is on Goff making poor decisions when plays were there. It holds up, good analysis.
And then on the other hand…here’s a dissenting view.
aeneas1
seems strange that mcvay could watch what chicago was doing and not tell goff to go underneath
and even stranger that mcvay would tell goff to go underneath only to have goff defy him because he was out to prove something, that he could push it downfield against the bears, which is what the breakdown suggests again and again.
if you watch the 22 the underneath pass just wasn’t part of the rams game plan, and the 22 paints a completely different story than what brett portrayed in the handful of examples he included.
what story does the 22 paint
the rams doing what they always do, running pass plays designed to push the ball downfield, close to or beyond the sticks, i.e. deep crossing / out routes, a lot of routes that take time to develop, not a lot of shallow underneath routes or slants, gurley in pass pro a lot, and chipping, as opposed to always cleanly slipping thru and being available for check downs.
the other thing it showed was that rams’ favorite formations from the 11, i.e. bunched and/or stacked wr inside the numbers, seemed to play into the bears hands, it didn’t spread out bears defenders, and enabled them to crowd the box on rushing plays and easily and quickly send a db or edge guy to the qb.