BLM's 10 point manifesto

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House BLM's 10 point manifesto

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #48937
    zn
    Moderator

    Black Lives Matter 10 Point Manifesto

    link: http://politicsbreaking.com/black-lives-matter-just-delivered-10-point-manifesto-want/

    Black Lives Matter (BLM), the activist group that campaigns agasint police brutality and racial injutice, have just come out with their plan to help fix the issues that plague police forces up and down the country.

    Their plan – “Campaign Zero” – focuses on 10 points where they would like the law to change. They believe that these changes will help stop racial profiling and lessen the dangers everyday citizens face when dealing with the police.

    To get an idea of what they are asking for we thought we’d provide a breakdown of their plan:

    1. End “broken windows” policing, which aggressively polices minor crimes in an attempt to stop larger ones.

    “Broken windows” policing is the idea that vigorously enforcing small crimes (like vandalism) will prevent larger crimes from happening. This law has allowed police to increase “stop and frisks”, which BLM claims enables racial stereotyping. They argue that Black men and women are unfairly targeted by police using this law as an excuse, and that this policy ultimately led to the death of Eric Garner (remember the guy that was choked to death after he was caught selling loose cigarettes). This is their first point in their plan, and probably the most controversial.

    2. Use community oversight for misconduct rather than having the police department decide what consequences officers should face.

    Rather than the police deciding how an officer is punished after they’ve committed a crime (like when an officer who caused a death is ‘punished’ by being put on paid leave for six months), they want an independent group to review all cases and dole out the punishments. Since, you know, the police department might be a tad on biased.

    3. Make standards for reporting police use of deadly force.

    A lot of reports of police using deadly force aren’t released to the public. This skews the statistics when it comes down to who died by police hands and it leaves the public in the dark about how the police operate. BLM want to standardize the reporting methods and make the whole process more transparent.

    4. Independently investigate and prosecute police misconduct.

    Much like point two, BLM doesn’t want the police investigating crimes committed by the police since it’s proven to be a recipe for trouble. Instead, they want an independently run government body to investigate whether or not an officer has violated the law. The short version: if a cop shoots someone, someone other than the cops should look into the case to see if that shooting was lawful.

    5. Have the racial makeup of police departments reflect the communities they serve.

    This one is simple enough to ask for, harder to carry out in practice. BLM want the police force to be racially representative of the areas they protect. If a community is 50% Black, 30% Hispanic, and 20% White, they want to see a police force that reflects those demographics. Hypothetically, for every two White officers they’d hire, they’d also hire five Black officers and three Hispanic officers.

    6. Require officers to wear body cameras.

    This policy has already been implemented in several different police forces across the country – and with great success in some cases. However, the debate starts when it comes down to when and why an officer can turn the camera off. For example, you wouldn’t want people watching you when you went for a piss, would you?

    7. Provide more training for police officers.

    More training is never a bad thing. Many supporters of BLM believe that a lot of the issues between police officers and citizens have been instigated by rookie cops that are a little too eager to prove themselves in the field, and they feel a little extra training could help that out.

    8. End for-profit policing practices.

    This is a biggie. As of now, the police can legally take any money or property that they “believe” is in some way linked to a crime, and they can use that money and property as they see fit, even if you’re never convicted of that crime. It’s called Civil Forfeiture and the police in many areas have used this “right” to fund their own agencies and precincts. This is a major issue, and many people from different walks of life see it as legalized robbery. For more information check out John Oliver’s take on it, as he explains it far more eloquently than I ever could.

    9. End the police use of military equipment.

    BLM argues that the police should be working with the community to provide peaceful resolutions to society’s issues and that the use of military equipment shows an intent to abuse their power over citizens. It drives home the Us vs Them mentality. Big guns and body armour = scared citizens. Open dialogue and transparency = happy citizens.

    10. Implement police union contracts that hold officers accountable for misconduct.

    So, police unions have a history of protecting police (shocking, I know). Police officers accused of misconduct are no exception, but other members are oftendiscouraged by their unions to speak out against those accused. This can delay convictions and stop valuable information or evidence from coming to light which prevents real justice. While the police need unions to protect their rights, BLM argue that the unions should play their part in weeding out the bad apples. If not, the abuse of power will continue because the bad officers know they can get away with it.

    #48939
    Billy_T
    Participant

    Sounds incredibly reasonable.

    Demilitarization, heavy training in deescalation — they’re suppose to be “peace officers” — and independent review. I think these top the list. But all ten are vital.

    And by independent review . . . they don’t mean adding another branch to the police force, like Internal Affairs. It shouldn’t be anything remotely connected. And that would mean it must be outside the local or state prosecutorial realm as well. Not under the various DAs, etc. etc. who, right now, tend to go pretty easy on police.

    #48942
    PA Ram
    Participant

    One of the problems with a BLM manifesto is that BLM is not really a national organization. It’s more like different chapters from each state and they all have their own leaders. There is not one single leader of the movement. This is probably where BLM needs to organize better and narrow the spokesmen or women to speak with one voice.

    On the #5 issue. I saw a BLM leader on CNN the other day rejecting that very thing. She didn’t feel it would make any difference. When asked if this was a good idea or if she supported it her answer was: “Absolutely not.”

    Now that may not be how the majority of BLM activists feel about that issue but that was her take.

    The media is partly responsible for the image that the group has of having one goal among its members with certain leaders who represent all members.

    I tried to track the link down to see where it came from—where it originated from–who issued it. I didn’t have much luck. I didn’t see anything posted on BLM website.

    So when something like this is released it needs to be examined within the context that it may not represent every chapter of BLM. They may have other demands, or disagree with others.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #48946
    wv
    Participant

    I would strongly support all of them, cept perhaps nos.1 and 9. Not sure about those.

    I was in the courthouse today in WV and the cops are just
    really hardcore about what should be done. Lots of talk of getting tougher,
    instead of more understanding. Its like war, now.

    One of the court security people said “you know what these BLM folks are all about, they are just like the Black Panthers. They have black panther members in the leadership (he meant that in a bad way). And then someone said to him “well the Klan is making a comeback too”
    and he responded “well the Klan could clean up a lot of this mess. They could help get rid of some of these (whispering now) niggers.”

    Have a nice day,
    w
    v

    #48947
    wv
    Participant

    Sounds incredibly reasonable.

    Demilitarization, heavy training in deescalation — they’re suppose to be “peace officers” — and independent review. I think these top the list. But all ten are vital.

    And by independent review . . . they don’t mean adding another branch to the police force, like Internal Affairs. It shouldn’t be anything remotely connected. And that would mean it must be outside the local or state prosecutorial realm as well. Not under the various DAs, etc. etc. who, right now, tend to go pretty easy on police.

    —————
    Seems like the “drug war” has lead to a lot of the militarization ideas. The drug dealers had better weapons and equipment so the cops felt outgunned.

    Weapons Corporations just love the drug war. Almost as much as they
    love militant-religious-humans. Its like that star trek episode where the blob of light
    got off on creating violent emotions….

    w
    v

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.